Government has done enough to educate people the importance of a balanced lifestyle and healthy eating habits.
What is supposed to make up the overall quality of our lives? Many people attach great importance to lifestyle and eating habits. In order to get to grips with these issues, the government has stepped into these areas. Some people reckon that the government has done enough to appeal to the masses to live healthier lives. However, as far as I am concerned, it is still imperative for the government to do more for the public.
Admittedly, the government has spared no effort to propose lots of motions to educate the public about a healthier way of life. Every year, the government invents a large amount of money to make propaganda videos about how to keep a balanced lifestyle, and how to relax and relieve oneself. Nowadays, the government also imposes the school to educate the youngster to keep healthy. Specifically, since COVID-19 still spreading all over the world, the government pays long-lasting attention to public hygiene and help people familiarize themselves with some basic medical knowledge and understanding.
However, it is undeniable that the government can do more for the public. Nowadays, society and companies still value work efficiency and urge employees to improve their productivity using various advanced multimedia applications and software. Just because the government has proposed some suggestions to help people live a balanced life does not mean the companies will follow this advice and give great priority to employees’ mental and physical health. For example, in China, many workers still work longer than 8 hours a day. Nevertheless, their leaders just ignore their situations and even punish them owing to the unfinished work. We all know that high-salary work is always associated with high risk. But we also need to cherish the value of life. Thus, it is high time for the government to make strict rules and ensure the implementation of them to help the public.
Moreover, an unhealthy lifestyle affects not only our personal life but also the fundamental function of our society. It is also advisable for the government to mobilize more power to help people establish healthier life since the government cannot manage the issue alone. To illustrate, the government of one country can communicate with other countries to make some worldwide solutions to address some earnest concerns of the people. They can cooperate with each other to build a stronger wall to grapple with some illnesses that are detrimental to worldwide public health. Moreover, the government of each county can also favor for scientists to promote international communication and collaboration in order to eliminate unhealthy lifestyles and eating habits efficiently. That’s what government still lacks.
With the reference to the arguments above, although the government has done a lot for the public, which constitutes the steppingstone for the future, there is still a long way for it to go. But with the sizzling development of society, officials in the government will definitely utilize their wits to tackle the present and potential challenges and problems regarding public happiness and health.
- Many organizations try to draw people s attention to serious problems such as climate change or poverty These organizations often use images photographs and videos to motivate people to take action against those problems Some organizations use sad images 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For any business to be successful it must spend a lot of money on advertising 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement People often buy products not because they really need them but because other people have them 76
- Which do you think is the best way for students to make new friends? A. Joining a sports team; B. Participating in community activities. C. Traveling. 73
- 2.Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: children should be required to help with household tasks as soon as they are able to do so? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.0752688172 310% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2635.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 499.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28056112224 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89328791783 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51503006012 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 825.3 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7367807 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.96 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.48 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239751503641 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662026280641 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068893381947 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135931926093 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670432971343 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 86.8835125448 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.