Governments should focus their budgets more on environmental protection than on economic development
In modern-day world, politics draw more attention rather than the past because political decisions place huge impacts on the people’">people’s lifestyle. also, in the long run it has some effects on future’s generations. one of the challenging issue in the politics’ world is allocating budget for different purposes which are in accord with society's priorities. one of the difficulty with allocating budget is that government should consider many interwoven factors depending on society’s circumstances. The inevitable question which has heated debate among people is how much money is allowed in the budget for certain purpose such as economic development, health program, education system, environmental protection, etc. Although some might maintain that government should allocate more budgets for economic development, I contend that government should place high priority on environmental protection. In the following paragraphs, I am going to elaborate on my viewpoint and provide some details to explicate my opinion.
The first fact that makes me hold this belief is that some environmental problems may take a long period of time to restore. Therefore, governments should have some laws to protect their natural resources such as forests, wildlife for future’s generations. Besides, it requires that all the countries over the world should have some global program in tandem to protect our planet better. To illustrate my viewpoint, I mentioned an example. Nowadays, global warming, which is controversial issue among governments, cause some irrecoverable problems such as increasing earth’s temperature, melting Antarctic ice, etc. if some governments produced more greenhouse gases, the earth would become warmer, some unimaginable incidents would happen and no one would able to predict how much time nature need to restore. also, it is mandatory that not only a country but also all the governments all over the world cooperate in global program to produce less amount of greenhouse gases.
another equally significant point to be mentioned is that environmental problems such as air pollution, deposing trash particularly in urban areas have direct effect on people’">people’s health. government should encourage people to protect their environments in order to improve their health. As a case in point, one of the outcomes of overflowing garbage is air pollution, which causes various respiratory diseases and other adverse health effects as contaminants are absorbed from lungs into other parts of the body. also, another outcomes of overflowing garbage is water pollution which affects all ecosystems existing in the water, including fishes and other animals that drink polluted water and humans that eat polluted meats and fishes. In order to prevent such dangerous problems governments can allocate some budget to recycle hazardous materials.
To put it briefly, all the enumerated reasons converge to the fact that governments should pay more attention on environmental protection. I highly recommend that not only all the governments all over the world but also every individual should focus more on environmental protections and consider as a global concern. In other words, environmental protections should not confine to boundaries because if it didn’t take seriously some irreparable problems which has adverse effect on people’">people’s lives in all nations and generations would happen.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...le''>people's lifestyle. also, in the long run it has some effects on...
^^^^
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...e effects on future's generations. one of the challenging issue in the politic...
^^^
Line 1, column 389, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...are in accord with societys priorities. one of the difficulty with allocating budge...
^^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... environmental problems may take a long period of time to restore. Therefore, governments shou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 822, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...t how much time nature need to restore. also, it is mandatory that not only a countr...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...e less amount of greenhouse gases. another equally significant point to be mention...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 211, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Government
...eople''>people's health. government should encourage people to protect thei...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 536, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...rom lungs into other parts of the body. also, another outcomes of overflowing garbag...
^^^^
Line 9, column 584, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...other outcomes of overflowing garbage is water pollution which affects all ecosys...
^^
Line 9, column 842, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ems governments can allocate some budget to recycle hazardous materials. To ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, briefly, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, as for, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2991.0 1977.66487455 151% => OK
No of words: 514.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81906614786 4.8611393121 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.67265348546 2.67179642975 137% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513618677043 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 926.1 618.680645161 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6383425433 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.954545455 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13636363636 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275634578394 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895240744625 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961707423854 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175597160566 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563774715474 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 58.1214874552 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 10.9000537634 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 86.8835125448 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.