Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Governments should focus their budgets more on environmental protection than on economic development.
In recent decades, we are facing lots of environmental problems because people who have lived on the Earth were careless about their surroundings, and also most governments didn’t try to conserve the environment. If governments don’t take serious action, we will be faced with a destructive crisis. If governments allocate their money to preserve the environment, some people I’m sure would believe that it is an important idea; others would disagree. In my point of view, paying attention and spending money to conserve the environment would be a positive addition for two important reasons.
The main reason is that all species including humans are prone to become extinct. Since that environmental issues have affected people’s health adversely; these problems cause people to suffer from serious diseases that the government should take serious action to solve the issues. Intangible example, we are living in an industrial city where most factories in our city are located in the center. Factories produce many toxic gases like CO, CO2 due to the activity of factories for a long time have increased the amounts of gases. Most people who are living in my city are suffering from pulmonary diseases. In fact, with each inhalation, the amounts of gases enter their lungs that will be hard to breathe; unfortunately, air pollution caused many people to die in recent years. Therefore, the government, by solving these problems, can help people. Governments should allocate their money to move factories, which are in the central city, to suburbs. Because having clean airplay a vital role in people’s health, this action of government can save people’s life. Also, this positive action will provide the earth with a proper place for the next generation.
Secondly, natural resources are one of the fundamental factors which people for continuing their lives need to it. But, wasting the e of natural processes and being non-renewable energies, in recent decades, we have faced the shortage of these energies that governments play a vital role in preserving the environment. The government with spending money on utilization of renewable energies can solve the problem of lacking non-renewable energy; moreover, they can help to survive the next generation. For example, in our country who are living the solar energy is used instead of using fossil fuels because the sun is a source that is durable and the weather of my country is most time sunny and my country has benefited from using the free source. Having solar panels use the energy of the sun easily. Also, using solar power has reduced dependence on foreign oil and fossil fuels for my country significantly because we do not have access to non-renewable energies. In addition, using solar panels is a good source of income for my country. Therefore, investing in renewable energy because of unlimited these energies can be a great point that people for a living do not have to be consider about the shortage of non-renewable energy, they can experience a more comfortable life. Therefore, allocating a budget to this energy not only helps the economy but also, will lead to the return of the capital of the government.
In sum, though some may oppose the plan, allocating money by the government can have profound effects both on the economic condition of countries and the longevity of people. So, if governments do not consider to problems of the environment and do not find a way to solve them, the generation of people will destroy. At that time, considering the economy would be pointless.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most business people are motivated only by the desire for more money 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should focus their budgets more on environmental protection than on economic development 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s better complete a project and then start another one than to do several things at the same time 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a proper place for the next generation. Secondly, natural resources are one of t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can experience a more comfortable life. Therefore, allocating a budget to this e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2991.0 1977.66487455 151% => OK
No of words: 585.0 407.700716846 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11282051282 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9180050066 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79824099701 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 956.7 618.680645161 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8856800069 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.038461538 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123781842673 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372256082497 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036865243555 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891625061434 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211300965311 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.