With help of technology, students nowadays can learn more information and learn it more quickly.
Some people may insist that due to development of technology, students don't focus on their study nowadays. But, in my opinion, improving technology of study make the educational system more efficient. So, I agree the statement that students recently are able to learn more information and learn it more quickly from helping of technology.
First of all, students can easily access to the information for study. Nowadays, we can find everything in Google and Youtube. I usually find out something for my study in Google and Youtube even it is materials from foreign countries. In Google, I can search many of thesis what is needed for researching papers. From Youtube, I can watch classes which are uploaded by foreign professors without any costs and the videos are completely helpful. If I was not able to use internet or computer, I couldn't do that. Internet makes my study easier.
Secondly, some programs give a efficient learning system. For example, Santa TOEIC which is the growing program for English study use big data for teaching TOEIC. They give some TOEIC questions for tutors and from the answers, they anaylzed what is weakness of each students. After that, they give questions to tutors which can overcome their weakness depending on the collected data. Many of my friends was able to get high TOEIC score using the remarkable program. Without improving technology, it must be impossible to use big data for learning English.
To sum up, developing of technology make people who try to learn something faster than before. Students can get all of the information in the world only sitting on the table and technological improvement give us super effiecient methods of learning which were not able to imagine the past. It seems like improving of technology is really helpful for study.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-25 | ursula | 70 | view |
| 2020-12-28 | Akshatagh | 70 | view |
| 2020-09-22 | AMARDEEP KOUR GEDHU | 76 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | swapnil.paliwal | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | S_Daftari | 90 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... to development of technology, students dont focus on their study nowadays. But, in ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...not able to use internet or computer, I couldnt do that. Internet makes my study easier...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...easier. Secondly, some programs give a efficient learning system. For example,...
^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ng faster than before. Students can get all of the information in the world only sitting o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, for example, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 299.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05685618729 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68587902794 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558528428094 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3319831098 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5789473684 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7368421053 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254019852022 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793571959335 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117245320798 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178272819636 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13087386978 0.0645574589148 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.