High school teachers spend most of class time lecturing while the students listen and take not.
Other high school teachers spend most of the classes time on discussion and projects that students are highly involved in and exchange their ideas. Which of these two approaches do you think is more effective for student learning and why?
Most of the people firmly believe that high school period is one of the most important courses for students. Because of in many countries the grades of this courses are important and effective about university and fields they will opt. consequently, this selection appoints their future job. So using different methods for better teaching student are a crucial purpose. Some high school teachers spend most of the classes time on discussion and projects that students are highly involved in and exchange their ideas. Some people disagree with this education manner and some of other people agree and It’s perfectly acceptable for me and I will state my reason follow …
The first place It seems counterpart in teaching is very interesting and instructive for often students. in this way, students have an opportunity to express their ideas and thoughts. Sometimes they have fascinating thoughts that even they are informative for teachers. And teachers can by inspiring of students ideas make new manners for teaching. On the other hand to encourage students to do research and prepare project posses great benefits for them such as they learn how to search in library and internet, how to take note and to summarize dates which they have found and along with they can learn more about subject units. More ever forcing students to incorporate discussions in classes to make students become able to speak in public and it is recognized a significant way for increasing self-confidence and preparing them for future lectures in their life.
The second place when students’ discus in class they are obliged to more focus on units and educational information. It can be very useful for students and they can be easier ready for exams. In spite of via having grade for the classic activity they will be calmer and without disturbance mind for their exam.
To make a long story short I should say using of discussion and projects are very advantageous for students that along with better teaching, it makes to boost personality characteristics of students and they become more self- confidence and more ingenious. As result, we have more able persons in future that they have a critical rule for the progress of our country. So every country should have programs to modify teaching methods and creating more effective and more informative manners to the education of students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-11-20 | saray denizi | 70 | view |
- background.Some people may hold the opinion that celebration and joyoce time is independent of the humans old and everyone could participate and experience equal happiness. Others, on the other hand, have negative attitude toward it. do you agree with whi 76
- do you agree or disagree it’s better for children to grow up in the countryside? 60
- sefgjhgjk 3
- do you agree or disagree that nowadays students are interested to politics. 76
- are you agree or disagree that children should use computer games? 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ause of in many countries the grades of this courses are important and effective abo...
^^^^
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...ut university and fields they will opt. consequently, this selection appoints their future j...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ing and instructive for often students. in this way, students have an opportunity ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, second, so, such as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09693877551 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71240536372 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515306122449 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.660531912 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.529411765 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0588235294 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47058823529 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228342894308 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965470380072 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181950724239 0.0737576698707 247% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143227185176 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11844681836 0.0645574589148 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.