Honesty is the most important personal character of a student organization or club
The world is rapidly developing, and correspondingly, the importance of personal quality can never be exaggerated. When it comes to a controversial issue about whether the honesty is the most significant character of a student organization, people hold different views, depending on personal experience, personality types and emotional concerns. As for me, I think obsessive honesty is not good for anybody.
Admittedly, honesty is usually appreciated as a great virtue, because with which it easier for an organization to succeed. An honest person can gain trust easily from others, so other team members are willing to follow. With this strong bond established, the work that the honesty one distributed will be completed quite well. However, to say honesty is the most important character is definitely an overstatement. Obsessive honesty can lead to harm to oneself and even the whole team or club. Why is this so? If a person is honest with his competitor, the opposite party will know the secret plan. With the plan leaked, the precious fruits will be plagiarized, causing catastrophic results to the whole organization. In this regard, I will refer to myself. When I was a freshman in the Science Club in my fresh year, I mentioned it by accident to my best friend Lisa that my club needed some rabbits for the physiology experience. However, I ignored that Lisa had joined in the Nature Club, one of our competitive organizations. With the plan leaked by Lisa, our competitor bought all the amount of rabbits we needed. As a result, our experience had to stop, which just put our club back at square one. And each time after, when I saw Lisa again, there was a certain embarrassment between us.
From my perspective, being responsible should be a more crucial factor for an organization or club. It is clear that a responsible person can help to maintain the stability of a team. When some errors happened, if a member does not admit the mistake himself, it is actually equal to not taking the responsibility for his own behavior. Then how would the rest of the team be willing to work for the person? How could the person keep the cohesion of the entire group? My best friend Oliver worked in the Students’ Union Club for about one year when entering Wu Han University. And according to him, whenever the students complained about the burden of working, the president always attributed the problem to other team members; he never checked on whether there was something wrong with his arrangement of the work time. Gradually, the group members felt so disappointed that they started to seek for opportunities in other Students’ clubs. Last time when I met Oliver, he told me that he was ready to leave, and he did not feel sorry at all.
My idea is thus quite clear: a successful organization should have a group of responsible members rather than some honest ones.
- Which would you choose a higher pay job with long hours or an average pay job with normal work hours Explain your choice using specific reasons and details 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Your job has more effect on your happiness than your social life does 3
- When people need to complain about a product or poor service some prefer to complain in writing and others prefer to complain in person Which way do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 7
- Honesty is the most important personal character of a student organization or club
- Honesty is the most important personal character of a student organization or club 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, so, then, thus, well, as for, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2400.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 489.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90797546012 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90823574605 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543967280164 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 749.7 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4419242747 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8888888889 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287639208513 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689665992575 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745212147639 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171419448598 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968980425176 0.0645574589148 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.