I encourage university art students to take science-related classes
More than ever before, there is a hot debate on education at the university. A growing number of people are advocating university art students should be permitted to decide by themselves whether they take science classes or not, while a small group of people remains the opposite opinion. From my perspective, I believe every university student should have taken science-related classes.
Firstly, Science-learning can develop your brain better. Art and literature are more demanding the function of our left brain, while science and data-calculating require relevantly more exercises on your right-side brain. For art students, when they are exposed to logical thinking, which can stimulate their right brain, thus training the balanced working of the brain. The regular switching between art class and science class is creating good exercising for the brian. In this sense, participating in various subjects learning is offering a great chance for our brain to regulate its operation more effectively. Therefore, science subject classes promote your brain to grow healthier and be more flexible.
Secondly, not giving up science left a window open for self-discovery. Students, particularly art students might hate the science-related classes, for these subjects are brain-taxing and energy-consuming. But, university students are too young to thoroughly understand their talents and limits at this age. If I were the teacher, I would persuade them to go through the uncomfortable learning process and discover the truth about themselves. In some cases, some art students, they might be found out that the way a university professor presents a math topic is very inspiring, which reignites their interests again. In some other cases, students in their young adulthood realize there is a basic commonality between art and science and are becoming dealing with science topics in a brand new way. Thus, they get closer to their authentic self rather than avoid difficulties. Even though using 4 years to know that science is not their talent, this experience could also provide a guideline for the next big decision in the future.
Thirdly, Science-learning educates students better fit into society. As we all know, general education is a highly applied and validated curriculum, which has become a trend and widely copied by universities all around the world since World War 2. With its core principle, students must establish a full and structured knowledge, which includes art and science. For those people who refuse science classes and grow to be scientific illiteracy, they have a low-efficiency time when they encounter certain missing gaps in work and life. For instance, If they quit the science classes and know nothing about blood circulation, air pressure, or have a lesser version of the world's geography, how do they cope with these information gaps when they come across a situation that required an instinct response. These blind spots in common things will harm their success in work and life.
All in all, I will recommend art students not quit science at university.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have taken science-related classes. Firstly, Science-learning can develop yo...
^^^
Line 10, column 671, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...essure, or have a lesser version of the worlds geography, how do they cope with these ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, while, for instance, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.0752688172 310% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2618.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36475409836 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97647939499 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577868852459 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 792.9 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.079199836 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.083333333 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343974835684 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980737725817 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835506694955 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208603795427 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698660978216 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.