If you could go back to some time and place to live with less pollution, would you want to go?
An ecosystem can be affected by multiple types of pollutions such as air, water, land, noise, etc. Various human activities are involved in increasing pollution, and it just not only affecting humans but the entire ecosystem. If I get a chance to go back a few years, then I would like to go, and live in a less polluted environment. I will elaborate on my reasons in the ensuing paragraphs.
First, urbanization includes numerous industries, and which releases dangerous pollutants in air and water. Common pollutants include carbon monoxide, lead, mercury, etc. Thus, many marine lives become extinct. Not only that but marine animals also get diseases, and it transmits to humans and animals who feed on marine life. If I would be in past then I would be able to explore more about animals who are at the edge of extinction.
Second, nowadays, pesticide use is increased in agriculture to improve the quantity of corps. Thus, the quality of food compromised it leads to many health problems. If I get a chance to go back in past, then I would be able to enjoy fresh organic food, and that does not harm my health. In past, cancer was a rare disease, but today it is very common. Research study illustrates that cancer happens mainly because of the pesticide uses for agriculture.
Lastly, not only industries but vehicles are also causing air pollution. Air pollution is responsible for lung diseases like asthma, lung cancer, pneumonia, and many more. Today, even children are having asthma. However, in past forests were more, so it helped to control damage which is done by human activities. If I live in past, then I would be able to live in a clean and fresh environment. I do not have to face so much air pollution because of the vehicles.
Let’s put in a nutshell, I would be able to live a relaxed life and get clean water and air because of that I would like to go back a few years and live in a less polluted environment.
- Classroom education is more helpful in life than lessons learned at home. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Use specific examples and reasons for your answer. 73
- Globalization” refers to growing economic and cultural interconnectedness between different regions of the world. Because modern transportation and electronic communication has made commercial relationships between distant people easier than ever before 3
- A teacher's ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being thought? Which one do you think is important? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 73
- People attend college or university for many different reasons. Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- A large number of students feel more excited about classes in which they can openly talk to the teacher, and the lectures are at a minimum. On the other hand, some students believe that a class that includes more lectures and less open discussions is a be 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 328, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ns and animals who feed on marine life. If I would be in past then I would be able...
^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
... problems. If I get a chance to go back in past, then I would be able to enjoy fresh or...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...food, and that does not harm my health. In past, cancer was a rare disease, but today i...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 325, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
... is done by human activities. If I live in past, then I would be able to live in a clea...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, second, so, then, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67346938776 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71299991779 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527696793003 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0073859665 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.3333333333 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15774313484 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044867116663 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079570516533 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108387896056 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692707810653 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.