If your friend wants to reduce living expenses, which one would you suggest?
1. Find a roommate that can share the living expenses.
2. Buy the new technology products (cell phone) less frequently.
3. Shop for less expensive food and cook at home (instead of eating in restaurant or buying expensive food item).
Nowadays, many people are facing high living expenses and want to save money in their daily life. As far as I concerned, finding a roommate who can share living expenses is the most useful method to reduce living expenses.
Firstly, finding a roommate can help us save money in many aspects. We can share the rent; the expenses of water, electricity and etc. with our roommates. This sort of expenses is the majority of living expenses. Take my cousin Lee as an example. Last year, he rented an apartment which cost 800 dollars per month. As Lee could not afford such a high rent, he found a roommate Wang. Then, Lee only needed to spend 400 dollars on rent each month. What was better, he could share the bill of water; electricity; gas and internet with Wang, too. These bills also cost a lot every month. In contrary, if Lee had shopped cheap food and cooked at home or bought technology products less frequently, he would haven’t been able to reduce the rent and the daily expense including the cost of water, electricity and so on. In short, finding a roommate is helpful for us to reduce living expense in many aspects.
Secondly, a roommate can not only help us save money, but also help us in our daily life. When we are ill or face some troubles, our roommate might lend us a hand. For instance, my friend Lily had a bad cold last month. Her parents and friends were not able to take care of her, because she went aboard to study. It was her roommate Rose who took her to the hospital and cooked meals for her. Because of Rose’s help, Lily recovered soon. However, if Lily had not find a roommate and saved money by shopping cheap food or buying technology products less frequently, she might have had to face all the troubles independently. Therefore, a roommate can not only help us reduce living expenses but also help us in our daily life.
Admittedly, buying new technology products and shopping less expensive food can reduce our living expenses. However, the expense of new technology products is far less than the rent, so people cannot save lots of money in this way. Besides, nowadays many people are busying on work so that they do not have enough time to cook at home. Thus, I insist that the best way to save money is to find a roommate who can share living expense.
In conclusion, if my friend want to reduce living expenses, I think the best way is to find a roommate who can share living expenses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-23 | wqx | 66 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | Pooja dave | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | Pooja dave | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ent; the expenses of water, electricity and etc. with our roommates. This sort of expens...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 468, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'found'.
Suggestion: found
...ecovered soon. However, if Lily had not find a roommate and saved money by shopping ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in short, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56363636364 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39496286139 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447727272727 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0622455338 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.3703703704 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2962962963 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.51851851852 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40284365077 0.236089414692 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112044466135 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122123264009 0.0737576698707 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280703040245 0.150856017488 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777208918316 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 11.7677419355 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.37 8.01818996416 79% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.002688172 45% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.