Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wait until the class or meeting is o

Essay topics:

Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?

-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away

-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade

-Say nothing

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

As a member of society, you may have been in a situation which you had to make hard decisions. One of these situations is that being in a class or meeting and the teacher or leader says something that you think is wrong. There are some choices you have, correct them immediately, wait and tell them in private, os even do not do anything. I think the best attitude is waiting and telling them in a better time. I substantiate my belief by providing some supportive reasons that are elaborated below.

First of all, consider the chance that you misunderstand the leader of the teacher. In this situation, interrupting their speech is not wise, and has a lot of consequences for you. For example, after that, others see you as a thoughtless person who does not think about what he or she wants to say. Another disadvantage is that this interrupt can wast meeting or class time or distract the professor and decrease their quality of speech. In contrast, if you wait until the event ends, you can tell them in private, and then you will understand you were wrong.

Secondly, it is possible the lecturer understand his or her mistake after a little time and corrects it. If you think about your experiences, you will see that it is common. I remember many times that I made a mistake, and after one of two minutes, I correct it. So by waiting, you give them this chance to correct themselves without any interruption so the problems mentioned before, losing time and distraction, will not happen.

Finally, If you are right and they do not correct their mistake, after the meeting you can talk to privately. By doing this, they understand their mistakes, and they can correct it in the next session. As a result, it shows that how much respect them that did not interrupt them. Additionally, they will know you as a responsible person, who cared about others, because you instead of being selfish and saying nothing you did speak to the leader or teacher.

The sum and substance of this essay are that when you noticed a statement is wrong, wait for it ends, and then talk to lecturer. This is because it is possible that you understand them badly, and if not, waiting will give them the chance to correct themselves. Besides, this attitude introduces you as a responsible and thoughtful person.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-03 kkang 76 view
2020-01-03 Bonjourkmm 3 view
2019-12-31 mahdi.sdt 76 view
2019-12-29 lucy2244 73 view
2019-12-21 marysv 70 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'meet'
Suggestion: meet
...vantage is that this interrupt can wast meeting or class time or distract the professor...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for example, i think, in contrast, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 80.0 43.0788530466 186% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67901234568 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64724984044 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481481481481 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9933920065 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.2380952381 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.80952380952 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270870512461 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880714116053 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608661086069 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161472121646 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550156800505 0.0645574589148 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.