It goes without saying that in this progressive and sophisticated world we live, human beings have been looking for ways to use their best to correct their mistakes and act better and in an appropriate way. Some people believe it is a good idea to correct our teacher's mistake by interrupting her speak, while some others have a point of view that we should wait until the class or meeting over, then talk to the teacher. However, some individuals have an opposite point of view , and say we should say nothing. In my vantage point, we should correct teacher's mistake after the class. In what follows, I will elaborate on my perspective.
First, it is significant to be mentioned that, correcting anyone's mistake help her to change her attitude and have a right manner. Put it in other word, the teacher understanding her mistake, has been struggling to find the correct things that leads to enhance her knowledge and gives her an environment to broaden her perspective. For instance, I had a meeting last month and I was nervous for this meeting, so I can not practice well and check my information with a reliable source like internet. I said something wrong about a history of an event, and one my managers correct my mistake and told me after the meeting. The history of that event would stick in my mind for ever and this correction requires me to study more about that event. Thus, this correction was beneficial for me in order to enlarge my data about a subject related to my study field.
Another reason which deserves some attention here is that, a teacher or a leader should have tolerance to bear negative comments and corrections from their students or listeners with the aim of teaching this manner to their students. In other words, if teachers accept their mistakes, they teach students to imitate this approach and correct their mistakes. But this attitude should be in private, after the class and without interruption of her speaking at that moment. Since talk in private is more beneficial and effective than among many people.
From what has been discussed above we may safely reach the conclusion that, correcting teachers' mistakes are beneficial since it not only enhance their knowledge but also teach student to be patient and accept corrections.
- Although the sale of rhinoceros horns is illegal worldwide rhinoceroses Rhinos are commonly poached hunted illegally for their horns which can be sold for tens of thousands of dollars per kilogram Rhino horns are so valuable that one type of rhino is alre 81
- The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people 70
- Governments should focus their budgets more on environmental protection than on economic development 70
- Governments should focus their budgets more on environmental protection than on economic development 70
- TPO-45 Integrated Writing Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rrect their mistakes and act better and in an appropriate way. Some people believe it is a good idea ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 479, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...dividuals have an opposite point of view , and say we should say nothing. In my va...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, then, thus, well, while, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84575835476 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63121028941 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53470437018 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3773211828 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.8125 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3125 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19243670471 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647531490374 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498665469056 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109890062313 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485630614912 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.