How to behave in the classroom when a teacher or meeting leader says something incorrect based on our opinion have always been a source of discussion. I am of the opinion that in such a situation one should choose to stay quiet and say nothing or wait until all the people are gone and then talk about the problem. In what follows, I will explain which choice is better based on the circumstances.
First, the participants of the class should say nothing if they are not confident that the statement raised by the teacher is not correct. In fact, the participants of a class or meeting should always consider that the teacher or meeting leader is more knowledgeable and experienced than them. So, when a participant thinks that the instructor mentions an incorrect statement, this does not necessarily mean that the mentioned statement is incorrect. For example, back in high school, there were a lot of times that I thought that the teacher stated an opinion that is incorrect, but after careful consideration at home, I have found that he is right. Indeed, I thought that teacher said something incorrect because of my limited knowledge.
However, proponents of the opposite view who believe that we should inform teacher from his mistakes in case that we think he/she states something incorrect might argue that it helps the teacher to correct his/her errors. In light of this, must we conclude that interrupting the class is the only way? Not necessarily. Under that circumstance, a person can wait until the end of the class and tell the teacher his/her concern when all the attendants are gone. In this way, not only do we not interrupt the class, but also we inform teacher if he/she talk about a matter incorrectly.
What I have argued here is that in such a situation in which instructor states something that we think is incorrect, we should choose to stay quiet in most of the cases because he is more knowledgeable and experienced than us, and in a few cases when we are confident that teacher says something incorrect, we should talk about the problem with his/her after the class is over.
- TPO-23 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons an 76
- You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with him or her? 70
- do you agree or disagree? The way people dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character? 70
- At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some un 65
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 551, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'talks'.
Suggestion: talks
...s, but also we inform teacher if he/she talk about a matter incorrectly. What I h...
^^^^
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m with his/her after the class is over.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.0286738351 227% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80769230769 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7147416977 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467032967033 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.9629544915 48.9658058833 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.615384615 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284592364811 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100844175333 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614308608015 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177085713514 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506894022079 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.1575268817 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.