Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
-Say nothing.
How to behave in a class or a meeting when the teacher or the meeting leader says something that is incorrect based on our opinion have always been a source of discussion. In my opinion, when the teacher or meeting leader states something incorrect, we should wait until the end of the class and when all the participants are gone, we should talk about the incorrect statement. In what follows, I will aptly substantiate my viewpoint.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that by waiting until the end of the class, we give time to the lecturer to correct the wrong part of his/her taking. In other words, it is possible that a teacher made the minor mistakes only because he/she is tired, and by waiting, the teacher can think about what he/she said and correct his/her wrong statement. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Back in high school, I had a chemistry teacher. Although he was very knowledgeable and experienced, he sometimes made minor mistakes, but the teacher corrected his/her mistake only a few seconds after doing that. Just Imagine all the students start to interrupts the teacher speech when he made an incorrect statement, not only could this interruption stop the teacher from staying focused on teaching, but also it could engender an inappropriate situation for the teacher in which he could not control the class properly.
In approaching this issue, apart from the fact mentioned above, one should regard another subtle point meticulously that interrupting a class and talking about a mistake of a teacher or lecturer in front of other participants can damage his/her reputation. We should always consider that we are all human, and humans are likely to make mistake or say something incorrect. So, it is not appropriate to talk about that mistake out load. An example of my brother’s experience can shed light on this. My brother is a university student, and as he said to me, once in one of the courses he attend, the professor made an incorrect statement, then my brother immediately interrupted the class and said that " you are not right professor"; the professor got angry, and not surprisingly he wanted my brother to leave the class. After that, the professor told my brother that he should know that interrupting the class is not a proper way to speak about a mistake of a lecturer. He wanted my brother to behave in a respectful way.
What I have argued here is that we should choose to speak with a lecturer or teacher about the statements we think is not correct after the class in view of the fact that teacher may correct their statement a bit later, and that by talking about teacher's mistake out loud, we damage her/his reputation. I cannot offer a comforting assurance that these are the only reasons for choosing this approach. I have merely scratched the surface of why we should not interrupt a class to talk about teacher's incorrect speech.
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 90
- You have long been friends with someone If they do something that you don t like should you still be friends with him or her 35
- You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with him or her? 81
- At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some un 65
- do you agree or disagree? The way people dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 665, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'interrupt'.
Suggestion: interrupt
... Just Imagine all the students start to interrupts the teacher speech when he made an inco...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 591, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'attends'.
Suggestion: attends
...id to me, once in one of the courses he attend, the professor made an incorrect statem...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1016, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a respectful way" with adverb for "respectful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ecturer. He wanted my brother to behave in a respectful way. What I have argued here is that we ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 518, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o talk about teachers incorrect speech.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, second, so, then, apart from, talking about, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2434.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83896620278 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77272201705 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441351888668 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 746.1 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.0813766613 48.9658058833 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.105263158 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4736842105 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253951879152 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803799015259 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758476657031 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17315214022 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746538583781 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.