Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
•Say nothing.
mistakes are an inevitable part of people's live, and they should be solved since they have a lot of impacts on different parts of lives. There are also various approaches to correct the errors. Some people prefer not to state the mistakes to whom did it for instance to their teachers, however, others do in different ways. In my perspective, I prefer to talk to my teacher if she delivered something false after the class with him or her alone. In what follows, I will explain my reasons and examples to illustrate my standpoint.
The first important point is that, by mentioning the teachers' mistakes after the class finished and all the students went out, you do respect them and you do not make them shy. If you do not wait and state the mistakes at the moment the teachers did, the students may do not trust their teachers’ knowledge anymore, because of what their teachers did not know or the incorrect information they taught. The teachers may think your intention is to ruin their reputations and in order to prevent the results they pretend that they did correct and you are wrong. Therefore, it is best to talk with their mistakes after class. A prime example from my own experience may shed some lights on this point. As I was a student in university, one session of biochemistry class I found that the professor delivered the subjects of the structure of enzymes so differently in comparison to the text book I have read, I was shocked but I postpone it to the end of the class. I mentioned his mistakes to clarify the truth. He appreciated that I realized his errors and the way I reminded his mistake, as well as promised me, he will explain the correct information next session. Therefore, by talking about errors after class do not make the teachers shy and do respect their knowledge.
Furthermore, talking about teachers’ mistakes reveals that you are self-confident person and you dare to state your own opinion as well as you assure about your knowledge. For instance, in that session of biochemistry class I was sure about what is the right information and I was brave enough to mentioning the professor's mistake in order to remind him he delivered incorrect information to other students. In another example as you self-esteemed enough to talking about a leaders’ mistakes maybe you did mistake. In this case, you could recognize your mistake and learn something that you have not known. Hence, mentioning the teachers’ mistake would help you learn more.
To sum up, according to all aforementioned reasons, I firmly choose the method that reminding the teachers' errors after class and alone. Since in this was. not only do not disrespect your teachers but also you demonstrate your self-assure.
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 79
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Mistakes
mistakes are an inevitable part of peoples live,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... teachers errors after class and alone. Since in this was. not only do not disrespect...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Not
...ter class and alone. Since in this was. not only do not disrespect your teachers bu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for instance, talking about, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 75.0 43.0788530466 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2277.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86538461538 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82752543795 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457264957265 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4298780186 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77272727273 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251164760794 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783109940181 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054179953583 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154207035038 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529318252577 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.