Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
•Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
These days attending classes and meeting is taking up the considerable amount of time for juveniles and also young people. The more these meetings and classes holding the right opinion, the better the society will be formed. Views on this topic are divided, while some people concede with the first option, some other people are great antagonists for this opt and concede with the other options. In my view, interrupting and correcting the mistakes right away is the best option. The reasons why I believe so, are manifold which three of them, which have the great reasoning will be elaborated upon hereunder.
First and foremost, there are so many people like me, that when they understand that something is wrong, their mind is all about whether my opinion is correct or the teacher and won't use the other speeches that are taken in the class. Consequently, we can't understand the rest of the lecture. For instance, this semester I am making a course named "Digital Circuit Desing" where we study VHDL and learn this programming language. I enrolled this class because I have had a background in programming in VHDL language. Two sessions ago, my teacher was teaching hazards and latency in circuits and making some assumptions about how we should draw a waveform for different elements. I believed that what he was talking about how to depict them was a great controversy with my previous knowledge. Thus, as he finished his sentence, I told him that based on my open education I think that you are wrong; also, I state my reasons. We made some debate and the other classmates that participated in class. And finally, he understands that he was making a groundless assumption. After that, we were all boosted up and continue to take part in the class. Thereby we had a better comprehension. As can be inference if I did not claim my opinion then, all my mind was consumed by this controversy of the views.
Second, when something is wrong and is told the students. Based on the background that the teacher is always right, the student will think that is the correct one, and a misleading assumption will be carried out. As I retailed my own life story in the previous paragraph; If at the time I didn't tell my opinion, other students would think that our teacher was right and they will learn to draw waveform like him. And that was a recipe for disaster.
Last but not least, the reason that will reinforce the previous assertions accounts for is when an individual think the allegation that is being asserted is wrong; If he/she doesn't speak out her/his opinion then, the person will never learn how to make claims when something is not correct or sensible. Consequently, that will lead to having lots of people who will let the dictators control and govern them
To sum up, I am a great believer that students and those who attend a classroom or a meeting should speak their mind when they are holding a different idea to have better people and interactional and beneficial classes and meetings.
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing TaskPterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered w 80
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing TaskAgnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitive 80
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing TaskPterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered w 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...re taken in the class. Consequently, we cant understand the rest of the lecture. For...
^^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...he previous paragraph; If at the time I didnt tell my opinion, other students would t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 175, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t is being asserted is wrong; If he/she doesnt speak out her/his opinion then, the per...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, second, so, then, thus, while, for instance, i think, talking about, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 15.1003584229 219% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.0286738351 245% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 76.0 43.0788530466 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2494.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 522.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77777777778 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64087529801 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488505747126 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 750.6 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.7767243794 48.9658058833 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.434782609 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6956521739 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86956521739 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14501155771 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465306631525 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575165299211 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0873629619554 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046327277027 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.