Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
•Say nothing.
Throughout history knowledge transformation for seasoned persons to others plays an important role in all civilized societies. No one can disregard the fact that people can make mistakes in specific circumstances and say something wrong according to the audience. The act of people listening to the lecturer is very important in this situation. Nowadays, many are adamant that a myriad of elements should be taken into consideration in order to examine its constructive and destructive facets of this issue. Due to its paramount importance, huge steps have been taken to elevate its role. Some people may hold the view that we should interrupt and notice lecturer about his/her wrong saying or at least say nothing; in the meantime, some others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe its better to postpone the objection and talk to the lecturer after the speech. From my vantage point, I believe that the latter viewpoint generally carries more weight. I what follows, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
First off, the first exquisite point to be mentioned is that the teacher or the meeting leaders are people as any of the others and may make mistakes even if they are well educated. In fact, stating their fault in front of their audience makes them embarrassed and shy. In this case, they may lose their confidence and cannot continue their speech focus. So, it is better to talk to them after their lecture and see if they are aware of their mistakes or not.
In approaching this issue, apart from what mentioned above, there is another subtle point which must be borne in mind. It happens sometimes that the person from the audience make a mistake or does not have enough knowledge about the subject. Actually, she/he find the information said by the lecturer incorrect according to her/his limited knowledge. So, it is better to wait until the end of class or meeting and discuss her/his opinions with the lecturer.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first ones which cross the mind at first glance, there are by no means the only reasons available. A noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistics revealed by a recent educational research conducted in our university, show that a huge percent of people prefer to express their ideas about lecturer's incorrect information after the talk. This study has been conducted between graduate and undergraduate students who attend the classes and meeting held by relevant department regularly. all of them completed a survey on how to behave in the mentioned situation. The statistics derived from their answers indicate that most of the participants in the study prefer to postpone their opinions to after the class.
In the final analysis, according to what was mentioned in the body paragraphs above, no one could deny the fact that aforementioned subject is a controversial matter of discussion which needs to be elaborately addressed to precisely examine its aspects. Nevertheless, there is authentic evidence which can lead us to this conclusion that in case of facing with wrong information in a class or meeting the best behavior is to wait until the end of speech and talk to lecturer in private.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'happens'.
Suggestion: sometimes happens
...e point which must be borne in mind. It happens sometimes that the person from the audience make ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'finds'.
Suggestion: finds
...dge about the subject. Actually, she/he find the information said by the lecturer in...
^^^^
Line 7, column 532, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: All
... held by relevant department regularly. all of them completed a survey on how to be...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, well, apart from, at least, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 52.1666666667 159% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2678.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 526.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09125475285 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79349966156 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505703422053 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 837.9 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9199529051 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.434782609 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8695652174 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69565217391 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142216925169 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377799075269 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512729141185 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847885362871 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319488279604 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.