Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that interrupting class or trying to correct a mistake that occurs in the classroom by professors or along a meeting is not known as a reasonable behavior. Contrary, to this popular beliefs there are still those who argue that each kink of mistakes that explain in the class can be led to misunderstanding for other students in the class and it is necessary to correct this mistake immediately. I, to a great extent, agree with this idea that trying to revise an incorrect issue in the classroom or in a meeting is not convincing.
First and foremost, it is very important that student should be considered the general culture of society. For example, I live in Iran and traditionally based on our culture the teachers or older people have special value. Mostly, in our society, the young people do not correct the mistake of older people mainly in the front of other people. Based on this view if students usually try to exhibiting teachers mistakes this behavior not accepted through others and most of the people believe that it is better to tell with this teacher after the class about its mistake.
On another significant fact, that should be taken into that consideration is that revising teachers mistake in the class can be caused to upsetting the teacher because maybe who has a bad feeling about his mistake in the front of students. This happens can have a very bad effect on teacher mind and efficiency of class. Because it can be led to the teachers become fright and hopeless to explain new materials and concepts during the class. Because he tries to conserve the confidence of his students for himself. in addition, this happens can have the bad influence on students too. Because if they lost their confidence to their teacher always have doubts about materials that expression by their teacher and it is led to decrease in their attention to the class and lower impact for research and activity.
On the basis of reason that mentioned above, I am convinced that correcting the teacher's mistake in the class just caused to the harmful effect on the classroom. Because of our cultural background and some psychological issues.
- People try new dangerous sports such as sky-diving or rock climbing. Should such sports be banned? 70
- T P O 53 3
- life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparent were children. 73
- Tpo 49 73
- one of the best ways that parents can help their children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 66, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'considered'?
Suggestion: considered
...s very important that student should be consider the general cultur of society. Fpr exam...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 222, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Mostly
...ers or oldrer people have special value.Mostly, in our society the young people do not...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tries'.
Suggestion: tries
...d concepts during the class. Because he try to conseve the cofidence of his student...
^^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...cofidence of his students for himselfe. in addition, this happen can have bad infl...
^^
Line 4, column 46, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e basis of reason that mentioned above, i am covinced that correcting the teacher...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, still, in addition, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83923705722 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64460192189 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490463215259 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.3495678213 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.857142857 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2142857143 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178021946136 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664842689235 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562526971645 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12143064634 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416195992938 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.