Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
In modern era, education is undoubtedly one of the most important aspect of societies. In this regard many academicians attend in classrooms and meeting in which scientific subjects are discussed. There is a debate among academician as to whether one should interrupt lecturer during the time of class to correct their mistakes or not. Quite a few people hold the view that it is rude to interrupt the lecturer during his or her presentation. However some inclined to the idea that it is necessary to do so. I personally subscribe to the former idea. In the following paragraph, I will elaborate upon my viewpoint through two clear reasons.
First, I personally consider interrupting of the lecturer during his or her presentation rude. For this reason it is absolutely wrong to interrupt a lecturer even if he or she made a mistake. For instance, consider my experience for lecturing in my physics class during my bachelor degree. I remember that i wanted to present an article about the electromagnetic waves. I tried my best to provide all material that is needed for an efficient presentation. During my speech one of students interrupt me to criticize my idea upon application of electromagnetic waves in industry. Due to the fact that the student interrupted me and criticized my view abruptly, I lost my concentration on my presentation. Consequently, i mentioned something incorrect and this leads to a negative point for my speech.
Another equally noteworthy point supporting my opinion is that, in formal seminars or class in universities it is prohibited to talk, or ask a question from lecturer during the time of speech. One should show respect to the formal rules and not interrupt the lecturer. To be more specific, regulation of asking question during the lecture is due to the fact that one question may lead to form another question in auditor's mind. In this regard every one attending in the class or seminar wants to ask his or her own question. Imagine how clumsy and informal that seminar would be. It not only leads to a disorder in the class, but also it distract all auditors from focusing on what exactly the lecture says. Although it is prohibited to ask question during speech, employees provide note book for each auditor and ask them to write their question in it. After the lecturer ended the speech, students can ask their question or maybe correct the mistake of the lecturer in a polite manner.
In conclusion, with all this taken into account, i personally incline toward an opinion to not interrupt the lecturer nor ask a question from them. I elucidate my viewpoint by stating two reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ed. There is a debate among academician as to whether one should interrupt lecturer during th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 444, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ecturer during his or her presentation. However some inclined to the idea that it is ne...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...viewpoint through two clear reasons. First, I personally consider interruptin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ing my bachelor degree. I remember that i wanted to present an article about the ...
^
Line 3, column 723, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ation on my presentation. Consequently, i mentioned something incorrect and this ...
^
Line 5, column 639, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'distracts'?
Suggestion: distracts
...to a disorder in the class, but also it distract all auditors from focusing on what exac...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 969, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a polite manner" with adverb for "polite"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ybe correct the mistake of the lecturer in a polite manner. In conclusion, with all this ta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the lecturer in a polite manner. In conclusion, with all this taken into ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, as to, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2194.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93033707865 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93083162574 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494382022472 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.0 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3542076704 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.76 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0495146761832 0.236089414692 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0174395590821 0.076458572812 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308088733602 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0349938856487 0.150856017488 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233802481585 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.