Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
•Say nothing
In my country, teachers and classrooms have high degree and they are so respectful. Each person may make mistakes; therefore, some persons who teach new things to the humans may make mistake. Sometimes educators and leadership of group when they are speaking, speakers say something in incorrect ways. So, the listener or students have many ways to tell teachers or leaders about her/him error. In my opinion, it's important that students must choose proper way that educators do not upset or the behavior of students don't show disrespect to the teachers. Hence, in this situation, I prefer converse about educators' fault after class, because of two reasons: first, its show respect of teachers and second, we have enough time to discuss about error.
To begin with, educators as the same as each person say incorrect information and the students can tell them about mistakes after finish classes. Since, person who instructing to the pupils have many classes, it causes make them tired so that teacher's say something in incorrect ways. Now, students who is listening to the teachers have duty to correct educators' mistake. If pupils who understand error tell to the teacher after class, it would better influence in the teacher and she or he does not upset. Also, owing to announcing error after class, it shows respect to the speakers. In addition to, people who make mistake have sufficient time to think about error and he or she can correct it for next classes.
Secondly, sometimes chief and educator says something in incorrect ways and it's not shows that they have week point. I believe that the best method to explain about this situation is speaking after class or meeting. Because of having suitable time, we can discus about error points. To shed light on the affirmation discussion, when I was master student, I took advance thermodynamic. In during semester, in one session, thermodynamic professors' tough some point in incorrect ways. I understood immediately, but I did not interrupt their spoke. Hence, after finishing the class, I told to the professors and we had enough time to discuss about mistake and solve it.
All things considered, it is important that tell to the teachers or leaders about their mistake in correct way. All of these ways are done by young people who spend enough time for their society. As far as I am, the best method is discussing about educators' error is after class or speech. Because its shoe respect to the teachers and also, we have adequate time to convers about slip.
- TPO 43 70
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 73
- Some people prefer to focus on ambitious dreams while others think realistic goals are moreimportant. Which do you prefer and why? 71
- TPO 27 70
- tpo 30 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 518, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...o not upset or the behavior of students dont show disrespect to the teachers. Hence,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95529411765 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55316995451 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2264296773 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5652173913 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4782608696 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69565217391 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160292897491 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546863444014 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366744453901 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111051795128 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00780961894688 0.0645574589148 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.