Imagine that you are planning to take a vacation and are trying to decide between two places to visit. Which of these two options do you believe would give you better information about making your choice? Why? ۱٫ Reading about the places online
۲٫ Discussing them with someone you know who has visited both places
In the modern era, travel has played a prominent role in all societies. Because it is of paramount importance, most people have always searched for ways to enhance the information about their destinations. Some people may hold the view that using the word wide web is the most practical and useful ways to get enough information about the host place. However, some others may take the opposite viewpoint and believe that asking people who travelled to the destination has several advantageous points than using the online. I contend that using the internet can help better than asking people. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first important factor to be mentioned is that the internet has up-to-date information about all things. To elaborate on my point, the internet consists of several pages about a place which people want to travel. Each page has a unique writer; hence, all the pages do not have the same information. In other words, when writers want to write an essay on their pages, they consider all information and viewpoints about the place. In these situations, the human would read positive and negative aspect of their destination place. So, they are able to better decide about their travels. However, when people ask others about the place, they absolutely say their viewpoint. In this situation, if they had pleasant memories of this city, they said only positive aspect. And, if they did not have pleasant memories, they only explain about negative aspects. So, people cannot make proper desition.
Another reason which I will deserve some words here is that the internet and online website have much information about the place. To shed more light on this matter, the world wide web supports all aspects of the places. The web sites not only have information but also have a lot of pictures about destination place. Therefore, people be able to see the picture of a place, and they can better decide about their travels. Furthermore, because of having several writers, possible of emitting some information is reduced. But, when ones travel to someplace, they only spend some days in the city. Hence, they would not see all see site and environment of the city. Therefore, their information is limit.
To wrap it up, considering the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that the internet is a trustful source for finding information about the place. I believe that the internet not only has up-to-date information but also has a lot of and adequate information in one place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 532, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... some information is reduced. But, when ones travel to someplace, they only spend so...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2150.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04694835681 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63596941675 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474178403756 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0259894073 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6923076923 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3846153846 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26923076923 5.45110844103 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197435165428 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631141218065 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489286777364 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13251646971 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300968382716 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.