To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professor.
Education has a significant role in our progress and prosperity, It can enhance our overall well- being because knowledge is power. Therefore, I agree that universities should increase faculty member salaries because it can help student to digest materials more easily, and they deserve it.
To begin with, educators’ main goal is to convey information effectively to their students. In fact, some of them end up buying educational tools or materials from their own pocket because they would facilitate the learning process of their class. For instance, in areas to pursue degree in biology, physics, chemistry, and other fields they require high-tic devices for laboratory such as microscopes, but most facilities cannot provide such tools. Thus, lecturer end up spending their earnings buying them to deliver knowledge appropriately in order to make students absorb information more easily. In addition, this manner would benefit universities along with students by making them well- known for graduating qualified alumni. Consequently, it is vital to increase teachers’ salaries due to the countless advantages on student’s performance and the facility itself.
Another reason this is the ideal decision it is show appreciation for their hard work. Indeed, educators deserve to be acknowledged because they work diligently to deliver concepts and prepare students for future occupations. For example, they dedicate countless hours preparing lectures, grading exams, and other duties, so universities can demonstrate their esteem in this manner. Moreover, it would improve a nation’s evolution because most professors dedicate some of their earning to conduct research in order to come up with solutions to ongoing problems such as global warming, and plastic pollution. Hence, increasing teachers’ income is a beneficial strategy to exhibit appreciation to them, and help nation’s grow.
In conclusion, teachers are nation builders. Therefore, I strongly recommend my selection because it has the best outcomes. Hopefully, this trend becomes more prevalence in the future
- Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him into an international celebrity. 71
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professor. 76
- Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him into an international celebrity. 80
- Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him into an international celebrity. 80
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professor. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 311.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8038585209 4.8611393121 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09595378676 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627009646302 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4102771032 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.8125 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.45110844103 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0930897039397 0.236089414692 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0277787219306 0.076458572812 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441651040569 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0556416067196 0.150856017488 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385192298234 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 10.9000537634 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.01818996416 127% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.