Integrated 48
In the reading, the author provides three solutions to solve the problem of decreasing the population of frogs in most parts of the world. However, finding all the ideas questionable and implausible, the lecturer casts doubt on each of the author's reasons and presents some evidence to the contrary.
First, the passage of the reading asserts that it is important to apply some laws to use pesticides by farmers because many species of frog are affected by pesticides which are used by farmers in their field. Conversely, the lecturer rebuts this point by explaining that these laws are not fair and economically practical. Due to the fact that farmers who are restricted to use pesticides near the habitat of frogs would encounter with several disadvantages. They can not compete with other farmers who live in other parts of the world, for producing more crops. Thus, they will lose the crops and profits.
Furthermore, the author declares that if there were some treatments on most of the frogs to kill the fungus which is responsible for lethal thickening the skin of frogs, the population of frogs would be preserved. On the contrary, the lecturer states that researchers should treat frogs individually. This process is very difficult because of the large scale of frogs. In addition, they should have medication for offspring of the frogs again and again to pass fungus from them which is so complicated and expensive. As it turns out; curing all frogs is not practical.
Finally, the author asserts that humans should limit their drainage of water from the habitat of frogs because these species are more rely on wet environments. However, the lecturer disagrees with this point. according to her, the excess use of water by people is not the major threat for the frogs. Global warming is the most important issue that frogs are dealing with it. Therefore, it causes the habitat of these animals to experience drought.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 210, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...the lecturer disagrees with this point. according to her, the excess use of water by peop...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'in addition', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233802816901 0.229887763892 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.146478873239 0.158761421928 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0704225352113 0.0866891130778 81% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0591549295775 0.046263068375 128% => OK
Pronouns: 0.030985915493 0.0685040099705 45% => OK
Prepositions: 0.152112676056 0.118717715034 128% => OK
Participles: 0.0366197183099 0.0351676179071 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.64328590576 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0281690140845 0.0309702414327 91% => OK
Particles: 0.00281690140845 0.00188951952338 149% => OK
Determiners: 0.123943661972 0.0887237588012 140% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0197183098592 0.0209618222197 94% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0140845070423 0.0139019557991 101% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1941.0 2387.08602151 81% => OK
No of words: 322.0 408.028673835 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.02795031056 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48200974243 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.33850931677 0.338922669872 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.254658385093 0.251872472559 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.173913043478 0.174417080927 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.124223602484 0.112833075102 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64328590576 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506211180124 0.524397521467 97% => OK
Word variations: 51.813356054 59.2087087015 88% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6684587814 82% => OK
Sentence length: 18.9411764706 20.5533526081 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6070460037 48.84282405 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.176470588 120.699889404 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 20.5533526081 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.705882352941 0.644075263715 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 44.4070149799 45.7405998639 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.78571428571 1.45489161554 123% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.300154397459 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0964563860673 0.103427244359 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0578807428192 0.0752933317313 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.561733085175 0.497263757937 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.167179466805 0.151897553556 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.114077575197 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0781384742642 0% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.452130093223 0.336927656856 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0731031436313 0.067059652881 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.210909579961 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0618886996521 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8870967742 42% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.86379928315 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 8.42114695341 36% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 13.6433691756 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.