It is better for children to choose jobs that is similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.
It is better for children to choose jobs that is similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.
371
Selecting a job can be one of the most difficult issues for all people. In my opinion, it is a good idea that children select a job that is similar to their parents' job. Here you can see my reasons.
First, children have more opportunity to save their time. Nowadays, because of the economic criticism, finding and establishing a job is a risky choice. And the safe action is gathering sufficient information to increase the possibility of becoming successful in their job \. Collecting information can be done by internet or interviewing by a people who have a same job, but it takes a lot of time and sometimes people do not want to speak about their experiences. This is a negative aspect of individual researching for becoming a knowledgeable person in a specific job. However, they can eliminate this part by choosing a job that are more similar to their parents’s job to utilise from their information without spending their time. They can use from their time for doing other vital activities to extend their job.
Second, avoiding from mental disorders is another remarkable reason. Some times people face difficulties in their job that are hard for them to understand and solve them. Most of the time their education and there is not sufficient, and they need extra skills in other fields. They must spend a great amount of energy and suffer hardship conditions. Eventually, they might solve them, but they become exhausted which gradually makes them a disappointed or nervous person. When they elect a job which which is almost related to their parents’d job, they can want from parents to guide them to pass their problems.
Third, a similar job can strengthen the relationship between parents and children. By emerging modern technologies such as internet, people spend most of their time for learning or finding new friends. This situation causes a gap between family members. In fact, they should detect a way to spend their time with parents. When their job has adequate similarity, they spend most of their time with them because they must speak about issues that related to the job. Maybe, they spend a bit of their time about other issues; for example, speaking about different kinds of their families’ problems. This circumstance increases the relationship between family members.
In conclusion, saveing time, preventing from mental disorders, and improving child relationship with their parents are there advantages that can, convince people to elect a task which has similarity with their parents’ job.
- tpo 33When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 65
- Tpo10. Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 73
- Students are influenced more by their teachers than by their friends. 66
- young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping to their communities 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lity of becoming successful in their job \. Collecting information can be done by...
^^
Line 9, column 495, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: which
...r nervous person. When they elect a job which which is almost related to their parents&apos...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, third, for example, in conclusion, in fact, speaking about, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2281.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12584269663 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84950057415 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474157303371 0.524837075471 90% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4637262001 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.24 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.581290309293 0.236089414692 246% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189880210832 0.076458572812 248% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.216990027669 0.0737576698707 294% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.433867812741 0.150856017488 288% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.261773881317 0.0645574589148 405% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.