It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree
There are some moot points about whether it is better for children to grow up in the countryside or in the big city. The question of the negative and positive aspects of these places has aroused as a subject of controversy among scholar. When it comes to my position, by weighing up the pros and the cons, I strongly subscribe to the point that it is better for children to grow up in a big city. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that one of the most significant factors for growing up children is education. Due to being more schools and kindergartens in the city, the rate of education in cities are higher than the countryside, therefore, kids have more opportunities to ameliorate their knowledge. As a case to the point, I vividly remember, when I was a child, my father enrolled me in the English language class. Owing to this class I learned English very sooner than my cousin who lived in the countryside. This class was very beneficial for me and the corollary of that was the high score in my entranced university exam. On the other hand, my cousin had a weak base in English and could not prospect in the entrance exam. My personal experience competently corroborates to the point that cities have more educational facilities for children.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that needless to say that urban place has more population than rural places. Thus, juveniles can be in touch with more people and children. This action gives rise to more friends and friendship which are very lucrative for everyone. My personal example demonstrates this reality some recent research which conducted at British Colombia university revealed that children who have more friends, can be more successful in their future life because they have more relationship. Hence they know which behaviors are appropriate and inappropriate. This experience will help them to be successful in the future. My personal example shed some light to the point that cities will help children to make more relationship.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that, it is better for children to grow up in the city. Cities not only improve their education but also, fortifies their relationship which will be fruitful for their future life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Harutyun Aslanyan | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Rashi123 | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | bishoy | 70 | view |
| 2019-05-31 | Ammu helen | 60 | view |
| 2019-03-22 | Reza partovi | 76 | view |
- Tpo 46 80
- Tpo 47 80
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurant. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- ome young people have free time in the evenings after school or on days off from school. Which of thefollowing activities would be most beneficial for young people (ages 14-18) to do in their spare time?Why?- Gaining practical work experience either at a 73
- Some people like to travel with a companion. Other people prefer to travel alone. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...fe because they have more relationship. Hence they know which behaviors are appropria...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90864197531 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82580699716 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496296296296 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.171440344 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244216565116 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873649514204 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129145734295 0.0737576698707 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187450073832 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111993370193 0.0645574589148 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.