It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay
There is no shortage of debate about whether it's better to raise children in a big city or a small town. In my opinion, it's more advantageous to raise young people in a big city, than to raise them in a rural area. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, Thanks to greater cultural exposure, children who are raised in a major city will be more capable of making well-informed decisions about their future. Metropolitan areas always have many academic and educational facilities, which will help intellectual development of children. Visiting those places on a regular basis could make people get interested in some of them. My own experience is a compelling example of what I mean. I grew up in a major urban area, which allowed my parents to take me to a landmark place almost every weekend. For example, we attended book readings at the library, art openings at the many galleries in our city and literary festivals. As a result, I got interested in an artistic career and I opted for a music major at university. Now, I enjoy a very successful career as a recording artist. Had I not visited so many stimulating places, I would not be thriving like I am today.
Secondly, getting raised in the city gives a chance to meet people from different walks of life. In contrast, In rural areas, people usually have very similar interests and habits. In addition, the city is always a magnet for new immigrants from diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds. For instance, my cousin is growing up in New York city, which is the largest city in my country. She is only ten years old but she was able to make friends from five different continents. Moreover, she is comfortable interacting with people who speak a large variety of languages, and who have different religious beliefs than her own.
In conclusion, growing up in the vibrant environment of big cities have many benefits over growing in small towns. many interesting places and diverse population surely help our children's progress
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 90
- In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely to 85
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they answer the specific problems presented in the reading passage.Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. How¬ever, there are doubts whether some paintin 3
- TPO-26 Integrated WritingThe zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot be stoppe 80
- TPO 18 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...y benefits over growing in small towns. many interesting places and diverse populati...
^^^^
Line 13, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation surely help our childrens progress
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, i feel, i mean, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81126760563 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76913873604 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585915492958 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4909787964 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.4 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149158976861 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420538569587 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413560711042 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100681531754 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350790181982 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.