It is better to do one project first and then begin to do another than to do several projects at the same time?
When dealing with multiple tasks at the same time, many people would undoubtedly prefer to finish them consecutively. However, it is my strong opinion that doing multiple projects at a time heavily outweighs approaching them one by one. The reasons for this are elaborated upon below.
First and foremost, performing a combination of tasks is more refreshing. If you take miscellaneous tasks at a time, you will definitely feel less bored and the diversity will cheer you up. I remember one time during my college, I had three class projects which were due together and I had to deliver them simultaneously. I found it would be more interesting to handle them together. I would try to solve my math project in the mornings, then investigate on my machine course term paper at noons and try designing my software project in the evenings. By choosing this strategy, I would sense the taste of freshness every time I changed the subject. Not only did this lead to a more enjoyable experience compared to that of my friend who dealt with these chores one by one, but also I was able to have a better estimation and view of my time chart.
Furthermore, doing a bit of every project at a time allows you to receive feedback from each one, thus letting you to have a better control over your schedule and a more precise assessment of your overall progress. When faced with a mix of projects, you will have a more accurate prediction of how to allocate your time and energy to each one if you examine them first. Moreover, while moving ahead according to the schedule, you are both doing and receiving information on how all projects are going. Since you are in control of things this way, your overall performance will get better and better progressively.
In conclusion, according to my experience, arranging versatile tasks in a parallel manner will result in a more desirable outcome compared to arranging them sequentially. This will allow you to enjoy from a better time as well as reach a more satisfactory ending, resulting from a flexible and pervasive approach.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-12 | SERDARKOCAK | 60 | view |
| 2018-08-19 | rezb70 | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 384, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...re interesting to handle them together. I would try to solve my math project in t...
^
Line 4, column 70, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a parallel manner" with adverb for "parallel"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...y experience, arranging versatile tasks in a parallel manner will result in a more desirable outcome...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80617977528 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83497391057 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539325842697 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7970684727 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.9375 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259846567955 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852461888869 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816134479667 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160848159666 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808695169799 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.