It is generally agreed that students cannot master all academic subjects simultaneously. In this regard, personally, I am prone to believe that it is better to choose on specific subject and to specialize in it. I hold this opinion since the competition in the labor market is harsh; specializing in one area is the right way to become a professional.
To begin with, today there are a lot of educational institutions which provide excellent education to a broad range of people. Moreover, the number of specialists in this or that area increases all the time. Consequently, it is harder to find a job for a young specialist than it was some a few decades ago. That is why employers value the ones who are specialized in specific and narrow areas since they do not need employees with merely broad range of knowledge. For example, when I was a student my choice was to specialize in the sphere of constitutional law and I was not paying too much attention to the other academic disciplines. As a result, after graduating I was immediately proposed a place in the Comparative law center since it needed narrow specialists in the field of constitutional law.
Additionally, a real professional is a person who has deep knowledge and skills in a concrete sphere. There are a lot of people that graduated from universities with broad knowledge of everything, but they cannot be valued in the professional community until they prove their superiority in a specific area. For instance, a friend of mine who is also a lawyer chose to specialize in the field of Criminal Procedure and he even performed his PhD in this area. Furthermore, he was also delivering lectures on this subject and wrote a book. This was his key to success since nowadays he is one of the respected and acknowledged specialists in the field of Criminal Procedure in my country. Thus, specialization is necessary for success.
To sum up briefly, we have a possibility to choose among subjects that we want to specialize in. However, it seems that choosing one subject is the best option since it helps find job easier and this is the precondition of becoming a full member of the professional community.
- This material addresses the question of survival of dinosaurs in the north of Alaska during its cold and dark winters. The reading passage suggests that dinosaurs migrated south to stay alive. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this information by s 80
- TPO 45- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 80
- The ancient clay jars excavated in Iraq might have been used as a source of energy. 81
- TPO 38 Writing IndependentDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- The best way to travel is in a group led by a travel guide 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, as to, for example, for instance, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82573726542 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11851912624 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522788203753 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5481544109 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.882352941 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9411764706 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276205668109 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813971740145 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635658185162 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174574844197 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637022042121 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.