It is better to learn from coworkers and friends than to learn from teachers and supervisors.
when it comes to gaining knowledge, it is better to turn to
teachers and supervisors than coworkers and friends.
Even if most people probably spend much time and energy
with their friends and colleagues in daily life. Honestly speaking, teachers and supervisors are highly experienced and knowledgeable. With appropriate methods, we are able to acquire new knowledge and skills from them.
First of all, it is exceedingly efficient and fast for people to learn from teachers and supervisors. According students’ characters, teachers particularly adjust their teaching methods to meet students’ demands. It means that students are able to relatively learn what they want in a short time. For example, my father attended an accounting course. He went to class twice a week. After three months, he took part in the accounting exam and eventually past the exam. If he studied independently and asked his colleagues for help, he would delicate the large amount of time and energy to his study. Because of specific teachers, he did not need to waste time to note significant knowledge. As a result, he not only saved time but also led to higher efficiency.
What’s more, with training and studying, teachers and supervisors are experienced and have specific knowledge in one field. Therefore, students enable to have a deeper understanding of certain subject. I have so many friends from different majors, such as computer and medical. However, when I asked them some issues involving their majors, they either gave me complex specific explanation or just knew part of them. Consequently, it is difficult and impossible for me to learn deeper from them. On the contrary, if I turn to teachers for help, they would illustrate these issues in a simple and understandable way and tell me more .
Surely, we often spend much time with friends and coworker, which provides us with a numbers of chances to learn something new from them. Besides, it is inevitably to pay for teachers and supervisors while it is free to learn for friends. However, as it costs us a great deal of money, we would be extremely motivated and hard-working when we are taking a class. Making full effort can contribute to satisfactory results. Additionally, coworkers and friends have no obligation on our study. Hence, they will not concerned about whether we gain knowledge. Contrast to friends and coworkers, teachers and supervisors are fairly responsible and patient on students. therefore, it is worthwhile to learn from teachers and supervisors.
In a word, teachers and supervisors allow us to study systematically and productively because of their proficient teaching skills. coworkers may be the proper partners and friends are reliable to share happiness and sorrow and both of them cannot teach us a lot comparing to teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-17 | Springlovers | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree the following statement These days children spend more time on doing homework or participating in organized activities related to schools and sports However they should be given more time to do whatever they want 90
- For success in a future job, the ability of relate well topeople is more important than studying hard in school. 76
- For success in a future job, the ability of relate well topeople is more important than studying hard in school. 76
- Students in a university club want to help others, but they can only choose one project a year, which one of the following is the best? A. Help those students in a nearby primary school with reading and mathematics; B. Help people who cannot afford to bui 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The more money people have, the more they should give away to charity. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
when it comes to gaining knowledge, it is be...
^^^^
Line 6, column 403, Rule ID: KNEW_NEW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'new'?
Suggestion: new
...me complex specific explanation or just knew part of them. Consequently, it is diffi...
^^^^
Line 6, column 636, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... and understandable way and tell me more . Surely, we often spend much time with...
^^
Line 7, column 513, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'concern'
Suggestion: concern
...tion on our study. Hence, they will not concerned about whether we gain knowledge. Contra...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 664, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...ly responsible and patient on students. therefore, it is worthwhile to learn from teacher...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Coworkers
...se of their proficient teaching skills. coworkers may be the proper partners and friends ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, hence, honestly, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, as a result, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 34.0 13.8261648746 246% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2374.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20614035088 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02843532207 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52850877193 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 718.2 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1166973254 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8620689655 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.724137931 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58620689655 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.53405017921 176% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320034225877 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831524287236 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114136426368 0.0737576698707 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13182119953 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906407733182 0.0645574589148 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.