Every day we face different situations that consciously or unconsciously we learn many things through them; on the other hand, we might seek for special information in specific books or other sources. In my opinion, learning from experiences is much more conducive to our life. These experiences could be ours or others. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, books are consisting of theories and claims that are not necessarily practical. On the other hand, lessons reached from a real problem are experimented. Therefore you can use them for further same situations. For example, I have studied marketing in university. We studied lots of methods and theories relevant to marketing; however, I couldn't use any of them in my job, as those methods were established in the America, in which, people have distinct attitudes and beliefs in proportion to my country. Sometimes it is impossible to localize the approaches presented in books, and you need to rely on your own findings via constant trial and errors.
Secondly, it is undeniable that books are a reliable source for gaining information in the required area, and basically they are the result of author's research and experiences. In fact, you don't need to experience something, which is experienced. For instance, I have recently read a book about a successful businessman. This book contains the facts caused either failure or success; how he committed mistakes and how he solved them in his way of progress. I tried to avoid his mistakes and follow his suggestions, which was useful for improvement in my job.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that people could learn from every source comprising different experiences; it could be from a book or their own life. That is because experiences are experimented and have an expected result.
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 70
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 86
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare Has this change improved the way people live Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- TPO49 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents are the best teachers Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...following essay. First of all, books are consisting of theories and claims that are not nec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...d from a real problem are experimented. Therefore you can use them for further same situa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ories relevant to marketing; however, I couldnt use any of them in my job, as those met...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... research and experiences. In fact, you dont need to experience something, which is ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08823529412 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95414172114 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584967320261 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5438665135 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5882352941 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.29411764706 5.45110844103 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140222251609 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447953668208 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487952901107 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0888592126939 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311564951428 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.