It is more fun to see a movie in the cinema with other people than see a movie at home
Some people contend that watching movie at home would be a better choice for them than in the movie theater. However, I hold the opposite view that I prefer enjoying movies at cinema, as I would be able to immerse into an atmosphere that brings them a totally different experience.
First and foremost, the experience of watching movies in the cinema would be impressive, as its environment is designed particularly for thousands of film funs all around the world. To be more specific, when 3D technology has come out, it was applied into entertainment field, especially for movies. It is no doubt that 3D technology makes environment more real than before, like all the characters and the sceneries happening right in front of your eyes, giving people sense of authenticity and elevating whole film industry to a new level that people would not be able to enjoy only by watching movies on TV or laptops. For instance, I saw a remake of Harry Potter with my friends last summer and it gives a totally different experience, even though I had saw original edition on my laptop for many times. It was the decisive battle that, in the end of the movie, Potter with his powerful wand fought with Lord Voldemort, settling all the grudge between them. Under the influence of sound and virtual effect, such decisive engagement elicited audience's mood and made me emotional. I realized Potter had grown up and showed courage in face of danger, while I did not have such intense feeling at home. In this case, 3D technology and sound effect in the cinema could be useful tools to draw the distance close between movies and audiences.
More importantly, another benefit of watching films with friends is that people get to share the films' plots with strange people, which makes watching movies a more pleasurable social activity. When people are seeing a kind of movie in the cinema, it is possible that audiences there have same emotion as the plot goes up and down. People are more likely to resonate with characters' encounters and have same topic that they are passionate about to share. Go back to the example stated above, a loyal fun of Harry Potter, named Bobby, sat beside me. Because we had same interest and enthusiasm for incredible magic world in Harry Potter, we started communicating with him rapidly, talking from film's plots to origin of such series. After film, I added friend with him on WeChat. Gradually I found, except for Harry Potter, we also had other interests, such as anime and soccer, and I felt fortunate to become friends with him.
In a nutshell, I still remain that people had better to see a film at home, since they would be able to enjoy a realistic atmosphere and get a chance to watch those specifically newly film in the first time.
- Universities should spend more money improving facilities such as libraries computer labs than hiring famous teachers 90
- The rules that the society today requires young people to follow and obey are too strict 85
- Do you think that young people should take several different kinds of job before they take a career in a long term 90
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel 67
- 70 The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors Over 80 percent of the respondents to a recent survey indicated a desire to reduce their intake of foods containing fats and cholesterol and today low fat products abound in many food 45
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1046, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'audiences'' or 'audience's'?
Suggestion: audiences'; audience's
...fect, such decisive engagement elicited audiences mood and made me emotional. I realized ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, then, thus, while, except for, for instance, in addition, kind of, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 92.0 52.1666666667 176% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3124.0 1977.66487455 158% => OK
No of words: 636.0 407.700716846 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91194968553 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.02185627292 4.48103885553 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61628605686 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 327.0 212.727598566 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514150943396 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 984.6 618.680645161 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2016383516 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.96 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.44 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375837789284 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106093363768 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849399578929 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218599784202 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533867539151 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 86.8835125448 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.