It is more important for the government to spend money to improve internet access than to improve public transportation.
Budget allocation priorities have been a key factor of a successful government. This mater that how the government had better allocate money to different parts is a controversial issue between people. A majority of people think that the government should allocate more money to Internet access than expand and improve public transportation. I personally think that although spending money on internet access has its own pros, allocating more money to public transportation carry more advantages. I will explain my viewpoint in the following essay.
The first noteworthy point regarding this issue is that public transportation can create a healthy society. When the government expands public transportation, people will use this transportation system more than before. In this situation, people prefer to go to their destination by public transportation instead of their private cars, and this matter can reduce air pollution and protect the environment. Also, public transportation helps people to live in a city without any traffic jam. Therefore, public transportation has a significant effect on mental and physical health.
More importantly, it is axiomatic that most of the public transportations are very fast, and they help people to save their time. In the sophisticated world where we are living, various kind of cutting-edge facilities come to our aid every day and facilitate our tasks. These advanced devices help people to produce some fast and environment-friendly transportation systems such as hybrid buses or fast trains. Hence, people can arrive at their destinations quickly. For example, when I was in university, I usually went to university by subway. It only took me fifteen minutes to arrive, but when I went by my private car it took me forty minutes.
All in all, by considering the mentioned reasons above, I think that it is more valuable that the government allocate money to improve public transportation rather than Internet access. This is owing to the fact that the government can protect the environment and increase public health, and public transportation avoids wasting time.
- summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- TPO 52Do you agree or disagree?The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. 60
- Essay topics: TPO 48 - Integrated Writing Task 76
- Essay topics: TPO 48 - Integrated Writing Task 75
- Question:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and e 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, regarding, so, therefore, for example, i think, kind of, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42121212121 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25063954999 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5440664919 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3888888889 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323418560834 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10184322982 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143006963875 0.0737576698707 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218012046771 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142394457587 0.0645574589148 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.