it is more important for the government to spend money on new building and than preserve historic places

Essay topics:

it is more important for the government to spend money on new building and than preserve historic places.

The answer to this question can be varied from person to person. In my opinion, the benefit of spending money on preserving historic places clearly outweighs that new building. There are some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.

The first reason why I agree with it is the tourist attraction. By preserving the historical places, governments are able to attract more tourists which boost the economy of their country. In fact, when a tourist comes to a country, they buy a wide variety of good while visiting the historical places. It is obvious that they cause providing much more job opportunities for native people. An example will illustrate this viewpoint much better. I am living in Behashr that there is a historical castle named "ABBAS ABAD". Subsequently, many people annually come to visit this amazing castle. My father is the mayor of our city, and he said me that due to coming a large number of foreign visitor to our history, people are experiencing better life quality because they have a great job which enables them to pay their way easily. For this reason, by spending money on preserving historical places, native people can have a high standard of living.

Secondly, nowadays, due to the progression of technology, people are experiencing an industrialized life. By spending money on historical places, people are able to escape from the bustling city to visit these places. As a matter of fact, they are able to release their stresses and tensions after a stressful and boring day of school or job by watching these places. Moreover, when I was a bachelor student, I had a part-time job at university campus magazine as a reporter. As I remember, one time, I had an interview with professor Nejati who is a well-known historian in my country. He said me that based on his expertise and researches the more a city have historical places, the more the more they can have better lives. He also said that if governments spend their money on their historical places, people are able to know their past better and use their lifestyle in their lives.

In conclusion, no one can deny the enormous effect of spending money on maintaining historical places. Not only is it able to promote the economy of that country, but also people can experience enjoyable life.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-02-08 Mehrdad.imn 87 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Mehrdad.imn :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 646, Rule ID: SAY_TELL[2]
Message: 'Say' cannot be followed by a direct personal object. Did you mean 'told'?
Suggestion: told
...father is the mayor of our city, and he said me that due to coming a large number of...
^^^^
Line 5, column 673, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...city, and he said me that due to coming a large number of foreign visitor to our history, people ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 591, Rule ID: SAY_TELL[2]
Message: 'Say' cannot be followed by a direct personal object. Did you mean 'told'?
Suggestion: told
... well-known historian in my country. He said me that based on his expertise and rese...
^^^^
Line 7, column 646, Rule ID: MORE_A_JJ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'a more city'?
Suggestion: a more city
...sed on his expertise and researches the more a city have historical places, the more the mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 682, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'the more'.
Suggestion: the more
...the more a city have historical places, the more the more they can have better lives. He also sai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, as a matter of fact, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92929292929 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78121000078 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502525252525 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9131832117 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9523809524 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.19047619048 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287226245238 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860263410856 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103555712325 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171931035275 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341497117725 0.0645574589148 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.