Friends are one of the most precious gifts in our life. If we hold it more tightly, it becomes stronger whereas if we don’t give more importance, it becomes fragile. Actually, we are one of the valuable parts in this entire society, so, human beings try to bond with each other to enhance the purpose of this society. Therefore, friendship is so much inevitable to build a salubrious society. But, during your entire journey, you will meet a lot of old and new friends, someone forgets their old friend and enjoy with other new friends but someone gives more importance to their old friends. Actually, I believe old friends are most precious than new friends, so, I bolster this statement that it is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
First of all, old friends know your strong and weak points, so, he or she has the capability to motivate you in different fields. Besides, when you are in danger and can’t find any way, old friend can give you the perfect suggestion because old friends know you very well as you spent lot of time with him or her. But to choose a new friend rather than old friend that need more time to know each other. So, everybody should care their old friends.
Second reason is that trust and believe are one of the most unavoidable quality that build a friendship stronger and more powerful. So, you can trust on your old friend because you spend more time with him or her and you extend your long friendship depends on this trust and believe. But you can’t trust on your new friend because within little time, it is impossible to know each other. For example, if you want to keep you money to you fiend, definitely one should choose old friend in state of new friend. So, to make your friendship better, one should not break the trust or believe because if it breaks, it is impossible to join.
Therefore, I advocate this statement with those valuable reasons. A man can’t live without anyone because we are social animals and we have the responsibility to hold this society based on strong relationship. Only a relationship can get us pleasure and it has the power to erase anxiety and prejudice from the society. So, everyone should respect their friendship and one may accept the new friends but should not forget their old friends.
- TPO-04 - Integrated Writing Task Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is wa 75
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. 60
- It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends. 60
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 71
- As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high. Archaeo 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f it breaks, it is impossible to join. Therefore, I advocate this statement wit...
^^^^
Line 7, column 447, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut should not forget their old friends.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67153284672 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44600223433 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435523114355 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9955808254 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.052631579 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6315789474 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437525161651 0.236089414692 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147295789198 0.076458572812 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177339698459 0.0737576698707 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278478219798 0.150856017488 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151617283085 0.0645574589148 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.79 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.