It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
Data gathering and data analyzing are the most important pillars of each society in today's world. Due to the fact we live in a chaotic and fast-paced world, it is important for us to improve our knowledge by collecting data from different sources and analyzing them. A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether people should hear and read news from opposite and alleged sources or whether they should hear it from sources that have similar opinions. Some people possess the conviction that the latter is more beneficial whereas I think the former is more fruitful. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind elucidating my standpoint is that when we hear news from different sources that have the opposite perspective from us, we can evaluate and analyze this news and compare this news with each other which makes us have a steady opinion about our positions. We can challenge ourselves and review our points to check whether are biased or not. Consider my point of view to make this point more clear. I am a fan of France's soccer team and I follow up on each match that they have. But one day I miss an important game and I had to read the local newspaper to know about the results. In that newspaper, the reporter challenged all of the team member performance and called them dysfunctional. Although I know it was a joke because they could get the top rank in the table, I felt angry about the information that was inserted in this newspaper and I found it was biased.
The second rationale reason behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that reading or watching opposite news can help us to improve some abilities. We can improve our logical and critical thinking and discussion our perspective with other people who has opposite beliefs. It goes without saying that this ability can help us to challenge others' opinions and overcome false or biased perspectives. In our university, we had a class where in it students who had different opinions could discuss together and enhance their soft skills. It was totally helpful for my future when I was to discuss with different people events that occurred in the world.
In brief, due to the aforementioned reasons, it is important for people to watch the news from different sources that have different views instead of hearing news from people who has similar opinion because it helps them to tolerate the opposite views and improve their soft skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-17 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-20 | redark777 | 90 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | janfaisal | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree Rather than help children with their schoolwork parents should encourage their children do their work independently 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important things people learn are from families 70
- Grades marks encourage students to learn 76
- Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country 70
- In order to attract more tourists the government could either improve safety by hiring more police or improve its appearance by repairing old buildings and streets Which way do you think is more effective 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 653, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...that newspaper, the reporter challenged all of the team member performance and called them...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, as to, i think, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2120.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8401826484 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60778970154 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470319634703 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.154129408 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.777777778 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196576554418 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593757056525 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693811987537 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153763544587 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819105699492 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.