It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
The group of people is observed all the time, might be a jobers groop, a studens group util a group of frinds. However, it’s not possible we say or judge somebody for your character for people that they are together. Therefore, I don’t agree with the argument that It’s primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves. Since that the people are differents anf think different.
My first reason is relate with homophobic situation. Much people judge a person if it are walkin, lunching out util hunging a gay person. This is a bad habity of the people and it is not good. For exemple, I have a friend that he is gay. And since I was young boy, I have long time with him. When we was youngest we spend a lot time together, and some people started say that I was gay because my friend. He styed very bad with this situation, and me to. However, we never cut our friendship because of the people comments.
My second reason, is that there are much bad politics and there are good to. Since that the people usually say, “ever politicians stolen ous” or “all politicans is not good” we are generalization. For instance, in Brazil we have much problems with politicans and always the civilation say that we don’t have any good politicans. However, we have somenoes that don’t made corruptions like the majory, like the president that was expulse because she made investigations with other jobers. Staying evident that there are some people different in the set of government.
Third, it’s impossible we know the nature of a person without know well. Since that all groups have people with different opinions, and the people usually discuss of the averthing and each member have a opino it’s impossible know the people. For exemple a group of friends that are going to a party, there are someone that drink alcaholic other not, and when you see one of them with a beer on the hand, don’t means that all will drink.
In conclusion, I don’t agree with the statement because it’s not good jouge the people without know. Therefore, I think berofe you joudge or say about sombody, you need meet it very well, for don’t say things inapropriated.
- government should offer college and university education free of charge to all students 73
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 35
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 73
- government should offer college and university education free of charge to all students 50
- Essay topics: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reasons and examples to s 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 368, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...social groups that we define ourselves. Since that the people are differents anf thin...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'related'.
Suggestion: related
...think different. My first reason is relate with homophobic situation. Much people ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 54, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: Many
...on is relate with homophobic situation. Much people judge a person if it are walkin...
^^^^
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...situation. Much people judge a person if it are walkin, lunching out util hunging...
^^
Line 4, column 88, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...tion. Much people judge a person if it are walkin, lunching out util hunging a gay...
^^^
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nging a gay person. This is a bad habity of the people and it is not good. For ex...
^^
Line 6, column 251, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...zation. For instance, in Brazil we have much problems with politicans and always the...
^^^^
Line 8, column 207, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s of the averthing and each member have a opino it's impossible know the peo...
^
Line 10, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...'t agree with the statement because it's not good jouge the people wit...
^^
Line 10, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee with the statement because it's not good jouge the people without know. ...
^^
Line 10, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ou joudge or say about sombody, you need meet it very well, for don't say th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9057591623 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69175130126 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484293193717 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6643139652 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1818181818 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3636363636 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238533344017 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737911914294 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131317027157 0.0737576698707 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14779687264 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137537106282 0.0645574589148 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.