It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship. Do you agree? Why or why not? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer.
There is no doubt that human is a social creature which has a natural tendency toward making beneficial friendships which are full of mentally and fanatically advantages. Actually, making companionship is vital because this not only can reduce the amount of someone’s stress, but also they can help each other during difficulties such as failure, deficiencies, improving their weaknesses and so forth. In this regard, a controversial question is that whether borrowing money from a friend can damage the rapport or not. Personally, it is my firm conviction that a cohesive friendship will not be affected by asking the monetary help because of the following considerable factors which are explored elaborately.
First and foremost, the vital and basic need of a constructive relation is that they support each other. It means, if they could, but they do not support each other, it is nothing more than a fake friendship which better to break it up. Indeed, we are seeking friends who have supportive characteristic during misfortunes because the duty of a friend is that to facilitate his/her friends’ issue. For example, I am such a human who like to be alone because most of the people are selfish and are not aware about basic rules in a real friendship. To put it differently, they just care about their needs, and when we need them they are not as supportive as us. However, I have some close friends who are really deserved it to call them friend. They not only did borrow me more than 20000 dollars when I wanted to rent my house, but also they resisted in order to get money back. In other words, the mentioned activity can not break a firm relation without any suspect.
Another worthwhile reason is that borrowing money can not harm a close friendship; nonetheless, it can boost its closeness. This favor can remove mentally distance between friends and make them more close to each other. Utterly understanding and knowing others are impossible; nevertheless, we can test the value of our relations with requesting various things such as money. If our friend accept the request, it can prove that he/she loves us and the companionship. As a result, this kindness makes positive feelings which add value to the friendship. To make the story short, this such worthy favors from friends creates excellent sense in us that will never be forgotten. So, it enhances the quality of the rapport which gives rise to a perfect relation.
To recapitulate, borrowing money from friends not only can not harm the rapport, but also can improve it. It is due to the fact that a real friend wishes to help her/his friend. Moreover, the asking can break the ice in the relation and make both sides more close.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-04 | Greenbluemind | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-28 | Uhernandes95 | 75 | view |
| 2020-06-24 | bijan54 | 70 | view |
| 2020-04-22 | DaVa20011218 | 76 | view |
| 2020-04-22 | DaVa20011218 | 70 | view |
- The environmental issue is too complex to be handled by individuals 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People now can better protect the environment than they could in the past 70
- Essay topics Integrated Tpo 65 Tuna Fish Farming Reading passage Wild tuna a species of large ocean fish have decreased in number because of overfishing Recently attempts have been made to farm tuna by feeding the fish in ocean cages until they become lar 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should sometimes do things that they do not enjoy doing Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Schools should ask students to evaluate their teachers Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, really, so, while, for example, no doubt, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2250.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88069414317 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75103152276 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516268980477 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 692.1 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6501487705 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.272727273 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9545454545 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188719585363 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641702640044 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672253921492 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136692475959 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405734399591 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.