Learn facts on the class room or on academic trip
Nowadays, there are lots of methods for teaching students such as academic travel or educating students by the Internet. In this way, some people would rather learn the fact on the class room while others prefer to learn new things in the academic travel. From my point of view, learning in the class room would be better since that is a convenient plan and that is cost-effective in comparison with academic trip as well. My arguments for these points are explained as follows.
First, is comfortable for students to learn their lessons in the class because in class they have lots of facilities such as blackboard or video projector. Actually, these devices can simplify learning process. However, in the academic trip you cannot access to the electricity or even you cannot have a blackboard. In addition, class room is like a shelter for graders. In other words, in the rainy days or days that the weather is not clear you are not able to go to academic trip in order to learn about new lessons. As a result, class is the best place for learning.
Second, academic trip needs plenty of money but staying at school and try to learn lessons in the class room does not need more money. For instance, for the academic trip you should prepare expensive instruments such as warm clothes or even specific shoes because of the bad weather conditions. However, you do not need these instruments for learning in the class room. Furthermore, for going to trip you need a vehicle therefore you should spend a lot of money in order to prepare a bus for the trip so students should pay a lot of money for commuting service.
All in all, from what I have discussed, these days, we witness many training methods that they help pupils so as to learn in the best way. Under this condition, some graders would like to learn their lessons in the academic trip but others like to learn in the class room. In my opinion, learning in the class would be beneficial for students because not only can they feel comfortable but also they are able to save their money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-07 | nilav | 66 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | sonyeoso | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-09 | Rasika0511 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | MotherAstronaut | 65 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | MotherAstronaut | 65 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...ly, these devices can simplify learning process. However, in the academic trip you cann...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... training methods that they help pupils so as to learn in the best way. Under this condi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64835164835 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45431017792 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447802197802 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.101330316 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5294117647 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2941176471 5.45110844103 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462991487644 0.236089414692 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16730751603 0.076458572812 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11987352924 0.0737576698707 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322073978097 0.150856017488 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599017217904 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.