Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the
present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and
examples to support your answer.
Our life consists of three time's events: past, present, and future. Consequences of those events are interconnected and one has a great impact on the next phase. Therefore, it is certain that everyone should learn from the past incidents to strengthen the weakness of our system. I personally believe that we should learn from the past facts for the betterment of our present and future life.
First and foremost, the past is the enumerated catalog of any system's loop-holes and one can better use of those by learning from them and strengthen those weak-points. In addition to that, one can reduce the probability of making mistake by enhancing his skills based on the past errors. Like, I used to enlist my errors of my past exam and I emphasized on them to make them better and I got a better score than past years. What's more, our present success dully depends on the hard work we had done in the past. Therefore, it is certain that one must learn from his past events to improve his present and future life.
Secondly, in the present day, every sector is developed gradually by improving on the past failures. From history to advanced scientific research, we gradually enhance our past weakness and make our system better than previous. For instance, in the scientific research, we use to track and take references from previous work and enhance our knowledge and our system more robust and skillful. Like, observing the effect of a radioactive element on the silver bromide paper, Rutherford invented the radioactivity and the radioactive materials. In addition to that, form the ancient culture, we learn our ancestor's life and the social structure and use those lessons in our present works.
Finally, it is not possible to know every twist and problems of our society and work. Therefore, we should learn from our previous weakness, show that we can predict possible problems with our system. So, it is pragmatic to learn from our past.
In conclusion, it has a positive consequence to learn from the past events. In every aspect of life and work, we learn from the past incidents and make our life better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-26 | FA1101 | 3 | view |
| 2017-11-25 | SANTANU MONDAL | 66 | view |
| 2017-11-25 | SANTANU MONDAL | 66 | view |
- Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725−1798) wrote a long memoir recounting hislife and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famouspeople, including kings and writers, his memoir has b 80
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
- "Never, never give up"-Agree or dis agree. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:“It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...d I got a better score than past years. Whats more, our present success dully depends...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...nstance, in the scientific research, we use to track and take references from previ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88397790055 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62165611728 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453038674033 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8454543693 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0526315789 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123939034128 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543328526628 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340436555106 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880277952757 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266495572968 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.