Life is full of obstacles and difficulties from birth to death. From a broad perspective, the quality of life is represented as a crucial indicators for every single person. I concur with the view that these days people have more convenient and simple life than their grandparents had. I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following paragraph.
First and foremost, the emergence of technology is a great revolution which has helped people live easier than before. Technology generates link between people around the world so they can communicate with each other even if they are far away. In the past, There were no facilities for this purpose and our grandparent had to meet their friend and families just face-to-face. As an example, we can talk with our relatives by smartphones which have great application. Actually it really facilitates our interaction.
Moreover, the advent of high-tech facilities has contributed to our life. Scientists and engineers produce a lot of high quality cars which allow us to commute very easily. I mean those cars which is using,have many equipment such as fan. During the period which our grandparents had lived, there were no automobile with fan. So they really annoyed when they had to take a trip during summer.
Thirdly, because of the presence to television and satellites, life is really easier now. People can be aware of the critical news which is taking place in the world and they enhance their knowledge about the diverse fields such as politician, economy and sports. Whereas, in the past, people had not this opportunity and they were not up-to-date. Also, their information was very superficial. My own experience demonstrates this concept. My grandmother told me, most people died for the diseases which spread in the city and people did not have any information about that.
In conclusion, I really believe that life is not as complex as past and people live more comfortable than before.
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparent were children 87
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'indicator'?
Suggestion: indicator
...ity of life is represented as a crucial indicators for every single person. I concur with ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... facilitates our interaction. Moreover, the advent of high-tech facilities has c...
^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , have
...easily. I mean those cars which is using,have many equipment such as fan. During the ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun equipment seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much equipment', 'a good deal of equipment'.
Suggestion: much equipment; a good deal of equipment
.... I mean those cars which is using,have many equipment such as fan. During the period which ou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, moreover, really, so, third, thirdly, whereas, i feel, i mean, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0243902439 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79699315904 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57012195122 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.328528993 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.4761904762 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.619047619 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170233697937 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500017317529 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057397882088 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109496881286 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052859259412 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.