lifestyle
When it comes to lifestyle in today's world, it is not far-fetched it brings up a highly controversial question, whether life nowadays is more convenient than before or not? Opinions may vary from person to person. Most of the people hold the opinion that life in the past was easier than today, however, some points out the bright sides of living in today's world in contrast with the first group. From my standpoint, I ponder that the contemporary world is worth living in since life in it is more comfortable than in the past. I will explicate my reasons behind this statement through the following essay.
The first reason immediately comes to mind is that advanced technology is a paramount part of today. As it is obvious, technology has prominent impacts on our life today and no one is untouched by its extremely swift development. There are myriad examples to consider. For example, people throughout the world can easily contact with each other by using Telegram, Facebook and such similar apps nowadays. kitchen appliance like microwave, blender, dishwasher, and so on can help people to save time. Transportation systems are so faster and safer than before, and so forth. Indeed all of these facilitate people's lives today.
The second point that can be taken into consideration is today' improved medical knowledge. Many types of diseases that had been causes of people's death in the past are now curable thanks to today's medical development. For instance, most of the infectious diseases like Smallpox are completely eradicated. According to the statistics, Smallpox was formerly the main cause of %30 fatality in the past decade. This example can shed more lights on the matter.
In brief, the aforementioned reasons can lead us to the conclusion that living in today's world is made it easy because welfare facilities develop, and medical knowledge is able to solve health problem more than before by new achievements over the time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-28 | Eshovo | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-28 | Eshovo | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-28 | Eshovo | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 76 | view |
- decline in reading literature 71
- national curreculum 16
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 70
- universities should give credit to sports and social activities as well as classes and libraries 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Kitchen
...acebook and such similar apps nowadays. kitchen appliance like microwave, blender, dish...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 575, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...er and safer than before, and so forth. Indeed all of these facilitate peoples lives t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 627, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f these facilitate peoples lives today. The second point that can be taken into ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, as for, for example, for instance, in brief, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 323.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06811145511 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75183612465 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603715170279 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.6644812069 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9444444444 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9444444444 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0321917711813 0.236089414692 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00918857754769 0.076458572812 12% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378854757783 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0169981046551 0.150856017488 11% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029441580895 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.