endotherms
The reading and the lecture are both about dinosaurs. The author of the reading asserts that dinosaurs were endotherms and provides 3 reasons of support. The lecturer challenges these claims. She is of the opinion that these are not correct.
First, the writer contends that the fossils have been found in Polar Regions indicate they were endotherms so that they could endure in such cold environments. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. She points out that the appearance of Polar dinosaurs fossils couldn't demonstrate that they were endotherms because first, the Polar region on that time would be warmer than today, furthermore, dinosaurs would migrate or would been hibernate at cooler part of the year.
Secondly, the author argues that the dinosaurs legs position and movement could be an evidence of being endotherms, with mentioning that their legs were under their body in order to physical activities like running. The lecturer, however rebuts this by asserting that the dinosaurs legs position under their body could have another cause. She states that this position could endure more weight so they could have very large size.
Finally, it is states in the article that dinosaurs bones structure had consist Haversian canals as the other endotherms have. This structure allows them to grow fast. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that although they had Haversian canals, they also had growth rings. these rings prove that they had stop growing or slow growing during cooler periods, whereas Endotherms can live in both cool and warm environment because they can preserve internal temperature in any climates.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-14 | TiOluwani97 | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | guna | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | nusybah | 85 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...erms and provides 3 reasons of support. The lecturer challenges these claims. She i...
^^^
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...e appearance of Polar dinosaurs fossils couldnt demonstrate that they were endotherms b...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have been' or 'be'?
Suggestion: have been; be
...rmore, dinosaurs would migrate or would been hibernate at cooler part of the year. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'hibernated'.
Suggestion: hibernated
..., dinosaurs would migrate or would been hibernate at cooler part of the year. Secondly...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'consisted'.
Suggestion: consisted
...icle that dinosaurs bones structure had consist Haversian canals as the other endotherm...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'consisted'.
Suggestion: consisted
...icle that dinosaurs bones structure had consist Haversian canals as the other endotherm...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ian canals, they also had growth rings. these rings prove that they had stop growing ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27376425856 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4526512741 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555133079848 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 70.978295044 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0714285714 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164860756397 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593304818681 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850505817201 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107801470385 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062526219329 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.