Luck does not play a major role in the success of an individual. Do you agree or disagree?
Everyone knows hard work and continuous practice on a subject brings success. For every field, the achievers know that without a diligent work and a proper plaining, the goal will not be achieved. I strongly, support that luck has not effect on the success of individual's work.
First and foremost, in the present day, we work very industrially and consistently to achieve our goal. Day by day, the competition is becoming more tougher in every areas. Therefore, to get success one should do hard work with a proper planing and under good guidence. For example, the school students, who studies diligently and follows the turor's schedule get good results. Whereas, those who does not follow the teacher's direction, can't get good scores.If the students don't study and waist time, luck will not help him to get good scores. So, for success needs only hard work and good strategy, but not luck. Therefore, I strongly believe on hard work for achieving success.
Secondly, we believe on science, because it presents us cogent argument to support its theory. In Present day, no one believes any unwarrented hypothesis. The luck brings success is a hypothetical theory and does not have any strong support. If the luck can bring success, one needs not to do work. Rather, everyone knows that hard work is indispensible to get sussess. For example, the famous football playes, they always practice to be fit and very skillful in their play. Otherwise, they will not perform well in the real play. In the militery force, the soldiers always do hard work even without war, they don't belief on luck. Therefore, It is obvious that luck does not play any role in success of individual.
In conclusion, luck does not have any role in the success of any body. Only diligent work and good strategy brings the success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 73
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. 70
- People attend college or university for many different reasons for example new experiences career preparation increased knowledge Why do you think people attend college or university Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in thepresent. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons andexamples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'effected'.
Suggestion: effected
.... I strongly, support that luck has not effect on the success of individuals work. ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
.... I strongly, support that luck has not effect on the success of individuals work. ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'tougher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: tougher
...Day by day, the competition is becoming more tougher in every areas. Therefore, to get succe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... Whereas, those who does not follow the teachers direction, cant get good scores.If the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...does not follow the teachers direction, cant get good scores.If the students dont st...
^^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...eachers direction, cant get good scores.If the students dont study and waist time,...
^^
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...n, cant get good scores.If the students dont study and waist time, luck will not hel...
^^^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'practice being'.
Suggestion: practice being
...the famous football playes, they always practice to be fit and very skillful in their play. Ot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 508, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r play. Otherwise, they will not perform well in the real play. In the militery f...
^^
Line 5, column 612, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ays do hard work even without war, they dont belief on luck. Therefore, It is obviou...
^^^^
Line 7, column 62, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anybody'?
Suggestion: anybody
...oes not have any role in the success of any body. Only diligent work and good strategy b...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90228013029 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54231554131 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511400651466 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5415716448 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.6666666667 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.619047619 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210467686625 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801466869143 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096685150831 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15085779114 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719410229345 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.