No one can deny the indisputable effects of industries and companies on the environment. Most companies do not care about the detrimental consequences of their acts, and they harm the precious environment. In this regard, some are of the opinion that they should become punished by some fees or taxes, while some are thinking thoroughly inverse. Regarding this controversial issue, I subscribe to the idea that devising some legislative rules enjoys more benefits. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will develop in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, companies will stop harming the environment because paying taxes is not economically efficient. If the government obliges establishments to pay significantly high taxes, they will cease producing harmful objects because they should spend most of their profits to pay the fines. I have to admit that my uncle’s experience has profoundly influenced my opinion on this matter. My uncle had a shoe company in Iran. They were using adherents to stick specific parts of the shoes, which were harmful to human breath. Accordingly, the government compelled his company to cease using that ingredient by taxing those adhesives. As a result, they stopped using those glues. Had they not agreed to quit using that material, they would have been bankrupt due to the high taxes.
Moreover, the government can use the money achieved by taxes for new environmental projects. Since most governments’ incomes rely on taxes gained from enterprises, devoting more taxes or penalties for breaking the ecological rules will supply governments with a significant amount of money. They can dedicate new sources of income to projects that save the planet earth from getting harmed by formidable actions. Consequently, even if the establishments do harmful activities, governments will become able to preserve a salubrious environment. Drawing an example from a well-known soup company in Iran, the soup company was packing its products with a lot of plastics, which were really redundant. The government compelled them to pay high taxes and used its money to buy plastic recycling machines. Thus, it is worth mentioning that environmental fines are a good source of income for the government, allowing them to start projects that are helpful for a clean area.
Consequently, In light of the reasons mentioned, it is beneficial for communities and governments to dedicate some penalties for companies in case of causing harm to the environment or living creatures. It is crystal clear that not only does it forces companies to cease doing things that are not profitable for them, but also it purveys money for governments to use in humanitarian projects.
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern 80
- The balance between human needs and environmental preservation is a central topic in the contemporary world As we expand our cities and industries we must also consider the effects on our natural habitats With that in mind here is the question for the dis 70
- When choosing a place for living which factor is the most important one for you A Living in an area that is not expensive B Living close to relatives C Living in an area with many shops and restaurants 70
- The toucan a brightly marked bird of the tropics of the Americas has long amazed people with its large colorful bill A third of the bird s entire length the bill is longer than that of any other bird and is strikingly colored Scientists have debated the q 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should focus on the happiness of others instead of their own happiness use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...develop in the subsequent paragraphs. First of all, companies will stop harmin...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... been bankrupt due to the high taxes. Moreover, the government can use the mon...
^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'force'?
Suggestion: force
... is crystal clear that not only does it forces companies to cease doing things that ar...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'force'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: force
... is crystal clear that not only does it forces companies to cease doing things that ar...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, really, regarding, so, thus, well, while, i feel, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2278.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28538283063 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0124927626 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533642691415 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1952140186 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.545454545 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5909090909 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171259654148 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552611844487 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343186927341 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100505081407 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209055702186 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.