Nowadays, although our society has witnessed the unprecedented accumulation of material affluence, some serious problems including climate change or poverty are still earnest concerns among the masses. Some organizations are devoted to grappling with these issues, meanwhile, a general controversy arises. Some people reckon that they should utilize sad images to prompt the public to take action, while others hold a reverse viewpoint that happy images will function better. As far as I am concerned, I definitely concur with the latter idea, and what I believe can be substantiated as follows.
In the first place, happy images equip people with the methods to deal with those serious problems. It is undeniable that almost all people are good in nature. They are enthusiastic about assisting others, but it is enormously demanding for them to help others in professional ways. If the masses are provided with happy images vividly demonstrating how difficulty can be handled, they will be motivated to follow the mature process to give hands to others who are mired in trouble. For example, after having a glimpse of the happy images shown by the UN’s official websites, I grasp a more comprehensive and clear view of how this organization functions, and in a similar way, I’m capable of mimicking some beneficial behaviors: promoting the living standards of the poor and narrowing the disparity between haves and have-nots; curb further pollution and improving the quality of our environment.
In addition, it is conceivable that people will be more touched by happiness than sorrow, which will significantly enhance the efficiency of those organizations. Our human beings always believe in hope and those happy images tell people that our efforts will eventually pay off if we try our best to contribute to those charity projects. To illustrate, if I know the effects of some cutting-edge technology aimed at protecting our environment shown by happy images, turning the desert into a wonderland, I will divert more resources to advocate this project. If I understand that every penny that I spend on poor people will largely improve their lives, I will donate a huger amount of money to them than before.
Admittedly, some people harbor the idea that sad images will reinforce people's consciousness about the terrible facts, and thus they can push people to take more action for themselves and the future generation. Some sad images exhibit what will happen if we don't safeguard what we possess. Nevertheless, just because sad images awaken individuals’ awareness, does not mean they will actually take further actions. Owing to the lack of relevant expertise and understanding about how to do it and what will happen, people may easily lose confidence in the process. These deficiencies cannot be compensated with ease.
In a nutshell, since we need not only propaganda but also actual behaviors to improve the situations of all human beings, happy images showing how we can get to grips with problems are supposed to come top of the list and be emphasized.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating young people about healthy food is important and should not be the job of families alone it should also be the responsibility of schools to teach their students about healthy eating 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement People often buy products not because they really need them but because other people have them 76
- Imagine that you have been given the opportunity to advise the government of a city or region area that you are familiar with to spend more money on ONE thing to benefit the city or region Which ONE of these do you believe would be the most beneficial for 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to spend money on traveling and vacation than save money for the future 73
- Some people believe that all the nations should use taxes to fund universities so that they could offer free university education to any student What is your opinion 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 661, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...of how this organization functions, and in a similar way, I’m capable of mimicking some benefici...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 259, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d images exhibit what will happen if we dont safeguard what we possess. Nevertheless...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, thus, while, for example, in addition, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2587.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20523138833 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88121747158 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 824.4 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.388013329 48.9658058833 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.157894737 100.406767564 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1578947368 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246168336181 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761269365702 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055202599939 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140100255681 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680373923163 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 86.8835125448 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 661, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...of how this organization functions, and in a similar way, I’m capable of mimicking some benefici...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 259, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d images exhibit what will happen if we dont safeguard what we possess. Nevertheless...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, thus, while, for example, in addition, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2587.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20523138833 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88121747158 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 824.4 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.388013329 48.9658058833 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.157894737 100.406767564 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1578947368 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246168336181 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761269365702 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055202599939 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140100255681 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680373923163 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 86.8835125448 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.