Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
These days, humans face the depletion of natural resources which are vital for our beings. Personally, if I were forced to choose one resource to preserve, I would choose to save forests. I feel this way for two significant reasons, which I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
First and foremost, forests have to be protected as they are habitats of the majority of flora and fauna. Without woodlands, most wild animals cannot survive due to a lack of food and habitats. Moreover, the extinction of animals has a negative impact on the ecosystem. To illustrate this, when I was younger, I usually went out hiking through the forest in Chonburi with my father, and we saw plenty of birds and monkeys. Unfortunately, in my last annual hiking, I saw that the monkey's population was drastically decreased because of deforestation around this area. Importantly, due to a monkey is a significant specie that keeps the population of hazardous insects in check. Therefore, the decrease of the monkey's population resulted in a decrease in plants, and this made the forest was critically damaged. As you can see, deforestation truly needs to be ceased in order to save our forests and ecosystem.
Secondly, forests also provide useful and renewable resources such as lumber to humans. Lumber is an essential natural resource that we use to build houses and equipment. Furthermore, it is renewable if people have efficient protection and invigilation. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was an architecture student, I learned about wood architecture, and I found that wood is still one of the most sustainable materials for construction. Because of its low thermal conductivity, a house built by wood reduces over sixty percent of heat from outside. Additionally, wood avoids an enormous amount of the emission of carbon dioxide from manufacturing that is a main factor of climate change. This means that if forests in the world are decreased, we will have fewer important natural resources.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that I would seriously preserve forests. This is due to the fact that a plethora of wild animals and plants in the world have to have forests as their habitats for surviving, and forests also provide natural resources that extremely useful for humans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'monkeys'' or 'monkey's'?
Suggestion: monkeys'; monkey's
...n my last annual hiking, I saw that the monkeys population was drastically decreased be...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 709, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'monkeys'' or 'monkey's'?
Suggestion: monkeys'; monkey's
...n check. Therefore, the decrease of the monkeys population resulted in a decrease in pl...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...s an essential natural resource that we use to build houses and equipment. Furtherm...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07349081365 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99401331093 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538057742782 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8103380792 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0476190476 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214478352869 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595337985423 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620272073299 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131690519916 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304522763427 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.