Are the close relationships between the people and their pets good? People express the different opinion about this. In my perspective, the close relationships are bad because of the following reasons.
First, from the close relationship the terrible accident can be occurred even the pets stay quietly with their owners and the environments. The behaviors of the animals cannot predict and sometimes, they show the unusual behavior. For example, I had a dog that lived in silently with me, as well as all neighbors. Moreover, people used to give the food and play with the dog. But, one day two people became injured by the dog while playing because of mistakenly caught the dog’s tail. However, a cat did not do any problem due to the fact that we did not became too close with that cat. Thus, being too close to the pets is bad for all people.
Next, the communicable disease can transfer from the pets. Although we daily clean the pets’ body and their cage, the pets can carry the various disease. For example, my brother had a parrot and became too close to my brother’s family. The parrot entered and ate with family members, and informed all the activities when the family members did not stay in homework. The parrot is like a family member but it suddenly turned into sadness. This is because all the family members were suffered from a flue carried by the parrot due to the fact that they became too close. In addition, many hens had died from the careless and closeness. Thus, the close relationships between the people and pets are bad and damage our health.
Finally, we cannot give the time for the real family member when we became the close with the pets. Time is a part and parcel for the close relationship. For example, my uncle has a small dog and most of the time he provides the time to that dog, play with that dog. On another hand, uncle has two children and they want to play with the uncle. They realize that their father loves that dog, not with them. The uncle’s nature adversely affects the child’s psychology and manner. However, my brother and his children do not become too close to their dog and the dog always act as a family member by proving safety and care to the children. Therefore, it is bad for the people who become too close to their pets.
In conclusion, even though the pets are essential for people, becoming too close to the pets is harmful. This is because a terrible accident can happen, the various disease can communicate and we cannot give the time properly to our family members.
- television has destroyed communication among friends and family. agree or disagree? 60
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 63
- In many parts of the world and throughout history government have moved their capitals Discuss the potential problems and benefits Say whether you would be in favor of moving your capital 21
- Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats, or other animals like members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 66
- People remember special gifts or presents that they have received. Why? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 560, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
...problem due to the fact that we did not became too close with that cat. Thus, being to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2114.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67699115044 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45615080876 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.433628318584 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2004857382 48.9658058833 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.5 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1428571429 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.60714285714 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205056288849 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070569930925 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708866100685 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140738670831 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843531457236 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.