Many schools require young children (aged 5-11) to work together in a small group instead of working alone during most of their learning process.
Nowadays, schools attach greater importance to adopting methods to improve education quality. The controversy has surrounded one issue that whether young children should be encouraged to work alone or in group. Some people are of the point that learning alone can provide a quiet environment and well-disciplined children. However, in my opinion, working together and having more discussions are more advantageous due to the following reasons。
One of the most interesting aspect of the current discussion which demands a keen contemplation is that studying in groups and discussing together is beneficial for juveniles’ study. Within the discussion, children are able to discuss the difficult points which they have a hard time digesting with the students who understand. By solving other students’ questions, it is an excellent opportunity for them to review the knowledge they learnt. In this case, all the children, including the one who ask questions and the one who answer questions, gain benefits from this process. Moreover, during studying, young teenagers are more susceptible to the distractions around them, for example, cartoons, TV and toys, resulting in a low efficiency. If they have the chance to stay together, motivation and encouragement from their peers go a long way to help them to concentrate. Therefore, studying together exerts positive influence in their study.
Another noteworthy aspect of the ongoing discussion which needs to be reflected is that working together enable children to expand their social network. Working together provides children with chances to communicate with each other and get to know each other better, which can be seen as the prerequisite of a friendship. Studying and discussion together in school can be extended to playing and having fun together in life, equipped students with the ability to expand their social networks. In contrast, if a child always stays alone facing all the difficulties himself, he won’t have the chance communicate with his classmates. Moreover, the frustration brought by stucking in knowledge will wear away his interests in studying. Thus, no social network and frustration will make him more and more eccentric. Thus, group discussion with peers is beneficial for them to build social network.
Admittedly, studying alone will result in a quite studying environment, so children are easily to be controlled. However, this fight-alone study method is not beneficial for students’ study or their social life, at least not good for all the children.
From what have been discussed, I draw a conclusion that school should advocate more study groups due to the advantages it brings to student’s study efficiency and their social network.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- The only effective way to encourage energy conservation is to increase prices of gasoline and electricity 91
- People who cannot accept criticism will not succeed working in teams 83
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?--Interrupt and correct the mistake right away--Wait until the class or meeting i 80
- Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on behavior of young people 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 656, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding distractions'?
Suggestion: the surrounding distractions
...young teenagers are more susceptible to the distractions around them, for example, cartoons, TV and toys, re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, at least, for example, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2338.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50117647059 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06460991156 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527058823529 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 693.0 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6085264273 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.9 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218178626542 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674749623185 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550932775891 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128195453062 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061194008007 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.