In modern times, children learn more from their parent. Others believe parents learn more from their children.
With the progress of technology and technological advance, the condition of life has changed dramatically. Children have accustomed to these new technologies better rather than their parents. Therefore, some people believe that children have a lot of information about different issues and they can help their parents. I, on the other hand, think that children learn more from their parents in today’s world. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will elaborate in the following essay.
First of all, parents have more experiences in life because they have come into different situations during their life. In contrast, children have not experienced a lot of different conditions since they have not lived independently. Most of the data that children gain from the internet or other sources are not reliable, and the majority of them are theoretical. Consequently, children cannot use this information in their life, and they have to consult with their parents who have more experience, and gain data. For example, when I was at university, I had a lot of problems to make a long-term plan for every semester. I was in the opinion that I could learn how to make a plan for studying with surfing on the internet, but I was not successful because I could not find a practical solution. Then, I decided to speak with my father about my situation. It is worth mentioning that my father is a professor of one of the high-ranked universities in my country. Hencforce, he could help me to make an effective plan, and I could get excellent grades in the university.
Secondly, children gain most of their data from the internet and social media, and most of this information is not reliable. As a matter of fact, if children make their decisions based on this information, they will not become successful in the future since most of them are not accurate. Most of the websites that share these data want to earn money through advertising different products, and they do not care about the accuracy of their information. As far as I am concerned, if children want to teach their parents a lesson that they have taught on the internet, most of their parents will not become satisfied with their words, and they will epitomize conditions for them to show that their lesson is not correct.
By way of conclusion, I strongly believe that children can be taught more from their parents in the modern-day of technology. This is because not only have their parents more experiences that they have learned from living in the severe conditions, but also most of the opinion that children have are from the social media, and they are not a reliable source of data.
- The reading and the lecture are both about dangerouses of glass for wild birds which is used in building modern architecture. The author of the reading believes that there are a plethora of solutions for this phenomena. The lecturer challenges this statem 66
- Summarize the points made in the lecture. Being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture. Being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 296, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... most of the opinion that children have are from the social media, and they are not...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, i feel, in contrast, as a matter of fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2210.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7866589204 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435164835165 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 685.8 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.86738351254 536% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9880342533 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40715449866 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138960556073 0.076458572812 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152487063859 0.0737576698707 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3146859614 0.150856017488 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10666807519 0.0645574589148 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.