The most important problems in today's' world will be solved in our lifetime.
The answer to this question can be varied from person to person. In my opinion, governments and individuals can solve the problems of society in their lifetime. There is some reason, the most outstanding of which will be discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
Firstly, I think that the most important solvable problem of our society is air pollution which cooperation among governments and fellow citizens could positively tackle to this issue. They are able to solve the air pollution by making some important decisions to reach positive output in their lifetime. AN example will illustrate this viewpoint much better. There was a time that the ration of air pollution was increasing so dramatically in our town. Subsequently, the government imposed "green taxes" on drivers who use their own car in city center or some specific overcrowded areas. Then, after ten years the index of pollution had become under emergency level. Until this incident did I realize the importance of acting practical laws to solve serious problems.
Secondly, another positive solution of air pollution is using of renewable sources energy. As a matter of fact, reducing the consumption of fossil fuels can be a great contribution to the elimination of air pollution in a short period of time. Thank to the progression of technology, governments are able to easily install a solar panel to get electricity or get the wind power in a short period of time. For instance, when I was a bachelor student, I had a part-time job at university campus magazine as a reporter. As I remember, one time, I had an interview with professor Nejati who is a well-known scientist in my country. He told me that by widespread using of renewable energy, the percentage of people who catch serious breathing diseases are becoming less and less. He also told me that nowadays people are experiencing healthier lives.
In conclusion, No one can deny the short time consequences of some decision. Not only are they able to solve the problems of society in fewr time, but also they can make people's lifestyle healthier.
- Many filmmakers make movies based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch the movie first. Which one do you think is better? Why?
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement competition among friends usually has a negative effect on friendship 67
- Many filmmakers make movies based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch the movie first. Which one do you think is better? Why?
- it is better to have a secure job 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 680, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Until” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ution had become under emergency level. Until this incident did I realize the importa...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...elimination of air pollution in a short period of time. Thank to the progression of technology...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 390, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ricity or get the wind power in a short period of time. For instance, when I was a bachelor st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06358381503 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93272149337 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566473988439 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4877030556 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2105263158 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2105263158 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21052631579 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197626090997 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528758776658 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561247990016 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120910226769 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914068049768 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.