Movies and television programs should present stories of good people being rewarded
and bad people being punished.
Do you agree or disagree with the statement?
People often possess different perspectives on what stories multimedia should present to the public. As for me, I strongly agree that television programs and movies should show contents of good people being rewarded and bad people being punished.
First of all, multimedia should focus on public security, and presenting stories of good people being rewarded and bad people being punished can enhance public security. For example, four years ago, Japanese television NHK established a series program of law cases. In brief, the program elaborated the consequences that drug dealers and murderers had faced. Moreover, it illustrated that the average period for a prisoner in jail is ten years. As a result, people felt fear about the penalties, and Japan’s crime rate started to drop 2% every year as well. On the other hand, if the NHK were not to emphasize the consequence of a crime, potential criminals would not understand the penalty of misdoing. Therefore, the crime rate might be continuously rising, and people will surely feel scared all the time.
Secondly, movies and television programs should put emphasis on education, and presenting stories of the kind will educate the public. For instance, recently, a television TVBS in my country has produced a new talk show to preach helping others. To be more specific, the talk show invites people who always gives help, and share their thoughts of helping others. Moreover, because their stories are so true and inspirational, everyone is touched when watching the show. As a result, I see so many people helping elders cross the street. On the contrary, if there was no such show to depict helping others, people might still behave coldly to each other in our daily life. Consequently, we all may be ignored when we need help.
Last but not least, multimedia should care about reputation, and presenting this kind of contents can help gain a higher reputation. Take a Singaporean television SBS as an example, it has made several episodes to advocate the importance of obeying the law. Also, those episodes are so popular because they regard people’s daily lives. As a result, this channel has become the iconic value of every Singaporean. In contrast, if SBS did not put efforts to present the rule of law, people might consider the television as an ordinary one. Apparently, the television would not end with such reputation.
In conclusion, I argue that movies and television programs should present stories of good people being rewarded and bad people being punished. After all, this multimedia generally cares about public security, education and more importantly, reputation.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children these days behave more impolitely than children fifty years ago 90
- If you are an owner of a company and is going to interview the following candidates which one of the following do you think would be the most helpful to the company 1 The candidate with the most experience 2 The candidate with the creative ideas 3 The can 76
- Some people say that teachers and parents should decide what assignment or activities children should do after school Others say that children should make these decisions on their own Which view do you agree with and why 70
- At some universities students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria But at some univ 76
- Some high school teachers teachers of students ages 14 18 spend most of class time lecturing speaking while the students listen and take notes Other high school teachers spend most of class time on discussion and projects that students are highly involved 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, after all, as for, for example, for instance, in brief, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, as a result, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2229.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1958041958 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72681844283 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529137529138 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7952542386 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.875 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9583333333 5.45110844103 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449953442268 0.236089414692 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123150077835 0.076458572812 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164446047518 0.0737576698707 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314040335753 0.150856017488 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152556227946 0.0645574589148 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.